2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(00)00550-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third-body dependence of rate coefficients for ozone formation in 16O–18O mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
37
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are summarized elsewhere. 1 The experiments involve a ''mass-independent'' isotope effect in ozone formation in scrambled systems and contrastingly different experimental results [25][26][27][28][29] in unscrambled systems. The latter show, instead, dramatic unconventional mass-dependent effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are summarized elsewhere. 1 The experiments involve a ''mass-independent'' isotope effect in ozone formation in scrambled systems and contrastingly different experimental results [25][26][27][28][29] in unscrambled systems. The latter show, instead, dramatic unconventional mass-dependent effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15%͒ non-Rice-Ramsperger-KasselMarcus ͑RRKM͒ effect gave rise to a dramatic effect, the so-called mass-independent isotope effect, in ozone formation. Recently, experiments on specific elementary reaction steps, [25][26][27][28] in contrast with scrambled systems, showed dramatic mass-dependent effects. This dichotomy between the behavior of individual recombination steps and of scrambled systems is treated in the present paper, using the formalism given in paper I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11). No direct experimental data on ozone isotope enrichments in a CO 2 bath are available and data on isotopomer specific rate coefficients in ozone formation (Guenther et al, 2000) do neither support nor disprove this hypothesis. While such an effect would qualitatively agree with the observations, it is not sufficient to quantitatively explain the strong dependency on ρ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may imply that the presence of CO 2 itself has an effect on the final equilibrium. On the one hand, it is possible that the higher stabilization efficiency of CO 2 compared to O 2 or N 2 in the formation of O 3 (∼2.7 Guenther et al, 2000) leads to a 2.7 times larger effective pressure (610 at ρ=0 instead of 225 hPa). Analysing available (Morton et al, 1990;Thiemens and Jackson, 1990) and new data on the effect of pressure on the isotope effects in ozone formation, this would correspond to a reduction of the equilibrium values by 17‰ and 22‰ for 17 O and 18 O, respectively (Tuzson and Janssen, 2007, see also Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%