2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thiol-click photochemistry for surface functionalization applied to optical biosensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thiolated monolayers allow rapid and simple immobilization of SH-DNA probes by different chemistries without using any crosslinker or other reagent, such as disulphide bond linkage (Sánchez del Rio et al, 2007), or through thiol-ene click photochemistry (Escorihuela et al, 2014a). The latter one can also be also employed by activation of the thiol group at the probe to further reaction with different functional groups at the sensor surface, such as alkenylated and alkynylated surfaces by forming thiol-ene and thiol-yne links, respectively (Bañuls et al, 2019). These approaches can be enhanced by the use of polythiolated probes, generating multiple anchor points at the sensor surface (Bañuls et al, 2017).…”
Section: Nucleic-acid Based Label-free Optical Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thiolated monolayers allow rapid and simple immobilization of SH-DNA probes by different chemistries without using any crosslinker or other reagent, such as disulphide bond linkage (Sánchez del Rio et al, 2007), or through thiol-ene click photochemistry (Escorihuela et al, 2014a). The latter one can also be also employed by activation of the thiol group at the probe to further reaction with different functional groups at the sensor surface, such as alkenylated and alkynylated surfaces by forming thiol-ene and thiol-yne links, respectively (Bañuls et al, 2019). These approaches can be enhanced by the use of polythiolated probes, generating multiple anchor points at the sensor surface (Bañuls et al, 2017).…”
Section: Nucleic-acid Based Label-free Optical Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, evanescent-wave biosensors have achieved great progress for NA analyses (Carrascosa et al, 2016). They have been benefited from improvements in biosensor fabrication and production quality (Fernández Gavela et al, 2016; Soler et al, 2019), the availability of new surface chemistry methods (Escorihuela et al, 2015; Escorihuela and Zuilhof, 2017; Bañuls et al, 2019), the availability of highly efficient probes for NA detection (Shi et al, 2015; Nafa et al, 2016; Aviñó et al, 2019a), and new approaches for the enhancement of the detected signal (Guo et al, 2015). Also, the biosensor integration with microfluidics permits the incorporation of different modules, including fluidic transportation, sorting, mixing or separation methods for liquid samples, and the automation of the complete analysis, which pave the way for the full development of the so-called lab-on-a-chip (LoC) platforms (Jung et al, 2015; Szydzik et al, 2015, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymeric materials obtained from thiol-click reactions should possess certain properties for drug delivery applications including nontoxicity and nonimmunogenicity, the ability to target specific sites, and the ability to remain in the body long enough to achieve the maximum therapeutic effect. All of these characteristics depend on the molecular architecture of the polymer as well as its functionality, which can be carefully controlled through thiol-click reactions. , The first example of the thiol Michael addition reaction was reported in the 1960s by Allen et al, and since then, it has become a critical tool for organic syntheses. Several research groups have exploited this reaction in polymer chemistry and material development .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrocarbon chain stabilizes the SAM through van der Waals interactions . The end groups with different properties could cause large changes in physical–chemical properties of the SAMs. ,,, For instance, the hydrophobic end group of −CH 3 makes the SAM surface hydrophobic and highly resistant to adhesion, whereas hydrophilic end groups (e.g., −COOH, −NH 2 , −OH) make the SAM surface hydrophilic and easy to interact with foreign species such as metal ions and biomolecules of proteins from aqueous solutions. , Studies on the mechanism of SAMs formation have indicated that the self-assembly process starts with the adsorption of thiols at metal substrates via the formation of Au–S covalent bonds, followed by the ordering and rearrangement of the thiol molecules. , It has been reported that introduction of a hydrophilic end group (−COOH, −NH 2 , or −OH) would decrease the orderliness of the formed SAMs as compared to the cases of SAMs with hydrophobic end groups . To date, the mechanism underlying how the properties of end groups affect the adsorption or the ordering and rearrangement processes of the thiol molecules is not particularly clear …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%