2017
DOI: 10.3159/torrey-d-16-00015r1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinning effects on canopy structure and ground layer diversity in a burned mesic oak savanna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in taxonomic richness patterns may be attributed to different stand types and ecoregions between the studies, as the South Carolina Pinus-dominated stands likely had different canopy-specific leaf area and structure compared with the mixed Pinus-Quercus stands. Increased richness was partially explained by increased light availability after fire, as past studies in other forest types had found (Phillips et al 2007;Phillips and Waldrop 2008;Barrioz et al 2013;Bowles et al 2017). As light availability is generally considered a limiting resource for ground flora in closed-canopy stands, we hypothesize that increased light availability caused by thinning and maintained by frequent burning provided adequate conditions for ground flora Fig.…”
Section: Ground Flora and Rapid Successionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Differences in taxonomic richness patterns may be attributed to different stand types and ecoregions between the studies, as the South Carolina Pinus-dominated stands likely had different canopy-specific leaf area and structure compared with the mixed Pinus-Quercus stands. Increased richness was partially explained by increased light availability after fire, as past studies in other forest types had found (Phillips et al 2007;Phillips and Waldrop 2008;Barrioz et al 2013;Bowles et al 2017). As light availability is generally considered a limiting resource for ground flora in closed-canopy stands, we hypothesize that increased light availability caused by thinning and maintained by frequent burning provided adequate conditions for ground flora Fig.…”
Section: Ground Flora and Rapid Successionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Ground-layer responses often include an increase in species richness, but the magnitude seems to hinge on what species persist aboveground and in the seed bank during oftentimes extended fire-free intervals prior to management. Studies combining thinning and burning treatments over short to intermediate time frames (4 to 19 yr) have been carried out in southern Ohio (Iverson et al 2017), eastern Tennessee (Vander Yacht et al 2017), southern Michigan (Bassett et al 2020), and northern Illinois (Bowles et al 2017) with similar results but with accelerated responses in the overstory and ground layer due to more rapid canopy thinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%