2004
DOI: 10.1126/science.1098276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinning and Flow of Tibetan Crust Constrained by Seismic Anisotropy

Abstract: Intermediate-period Rayleigh and Love waves propagating across Tibet indicate marked radial anisotropy within the middle-to-lower crust, consistent with a thinning of the middle crust by about 30%. The anisotropy is largest in the western part of the plateau, where moment tensors of earthquakes indicate active crustal thinning. The preferred orientation of mica crystals resulting from the crustal thinning can account for the observed anisotropy. The middle-to-lower crust of Tibet appears to have thinned more t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
277
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(7 reference statements)
18
277
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recent Himalayan-Tibetan tectonic investigations have proposed a weak middle-lower crust, which allows crustal flow, to explain the building of the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau [Clark and Royden, 2000;Beaumont et al, 2001;Schoenbohm et al, 2006]. This idea is supported by results from geophysical studies that show evidence for localized partial melt within the middle crust in Tibet [Kind et al, 1996;Wei et al, 2001] and a radial anisotropy that can be caused by channel flow within the mid-to-lower Tibetan crust [Shapiro et al, 2004]. However, contrary to the notion that the north -south rift zones in the Tibetan Plateau are shallow features, formed by the eastward motion of the shallow crust that are decoupled from the mantle lithosphere by a low-viscosity lower crust, our results suggest an upper mantle origin of the rift zones, at least in southeastern Tibet, where mantle lithosphere delamination plays a key role in the process of the rise of the plateau.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Several recent Himalayan-Tibetan tectonic investigations have proposed a weak middle-lower crust, which allows crustal flow, to explain the building of the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau [Clark and Royden, 2000;Beaumont et al, 2001;Schoenbohm et al, 2006]. This idea is supported by results from geophysical studies that show evidence for localized partial melt within the middle crust in Tibet [Kind et al, 1996;Wei et al, 2001] and a radial anisotropy that can be caused by channel flow within the mid-to-lower Tibetan crust [Shapiro et al, 2004]. However, contrary to the notion that the north -south rift zones in the Tibetan Plateau are shallow features, formed by the eastward motion of the shallow crust that are decoupled from the mantle lithosphere by a low-viscosity lower crust, our results suggest an upper mantle origin of the rift zones, at least in southeastern Tibet, where mantle lithosphere delamination plays a key role in the process of the rise of the plateau.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Radial anisotropy (the difference between the vertically and horizontally polarized waves: V SV and V SH , respectively, in the case of S waves) is also well documented (e.g., Shapiro et al 2004;Huang et al 2010;Duret et al 2010;Guo et al 2012;Xie et al 2013;Li et al 2016). …”
Section: Azimuthal and Radial Anisotropy Beneath Tibet: A Brief Synthmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Radial anisotropy in the middle and lower crust is thought to be primarily due to near-horizontal alignment of the sheet-like crystals of mica (e.g., biotite and muscovite) (e.g., Shapiro et al 2004;Meissner et al 2006). It can be large: V SH exceeds V SV by up to ∼10 per cent in central Tibet (e.g., Shapiro et al 2004;Duret et al 2010;Agius & Lebedev 2014).…”
Section: Origin Of Anisotropy and Its Relationship To Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The channel flow model is based on both geological constraints from the Greater Himalaya and geophysical constraints from the INDEPTH seismic experiments in southern Tibet (Zhao et al 1993;Nelson et al 1996). Intermediate-period Rayleigh and Love waves propagating across Tibet indicate a radial anisotropy in the middle-lower crust consistent with a 20-40% thinning of the middle crust and consistent with channel flow (Shapiro et al 2004). The geologically constrained parameters include a 10-20 km thick middle crust composed of sillimanite-K-feldspar grade gneisses, migmatites and leucogranites bounded by an inverted metamorphic sequence above the Main Central Thrust along the base and a right-way-up metamorphic sequence beneath a major low-angle normal fault, the South Tibetan Detachment, along the top (Searle et al , 2010b.…”
Section: Himalayan Channel Flow Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%