2011
DOI: 10.1080/1941126x.2011.576955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Think Locally: A Prudent Approach to Electronic Resource Management Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 The decision to go only with the licensing module was based on a degree of satisfaction with the effectiveness of the SFX link resolver, A-Z lists, and MARC records service already in use at NUL and a reluctance to take on the expense in funding and staff time to implement a full-fledged ERMS. Gustafson-Sundell stated that libraries should carefully consider tools already in place, prior commitments of staff, and other local conditions before deciding to implement an ERMS.…”
Section: Tools and Resources Used In Acquisitions Work Electronic Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The decision to go only with the licensing module was based on a degree of satisfaction with the effectiveness of the SFX link resolver, A-Z lists, and MARC records service already in use at NUL and a reluctance to take on the expense in funding and staff time to implement a full-fledged ERMS. Gustafson-Sundell stated that libraries should carefully consider tools already in place, prior commitments of staff, and other local conditions before deciding to implement an ERMS.…”
Section: Tools and Resources Used In Acquisitions Work Electronic Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can include staff time to test and implement hardware, staff time to support it, as well as other unforeseen costs. They could also include any resources that would be required from other departments such as the Library Information Technology (IT) Department (Gustafson-Sundell, 2011). To try and keep support costs to a minimum, each choice was ranked on whether support was available from the vendor and/or local IT staff.…”
Section: System Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%