2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin-Walled Part Machining Process Parameters Optimization based on Finite-Element Modeling of Workpiece Vibrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, optimization strategies are generally based on the selection of spindle speed [23], which governs the frequency content of the cutting forces and thus could reduce vibration levels, without affecting productivity or altering system layout. However, the selection of spindle speed has conflicting requirements for forced and chatter vibrations.…”
Section: Optimization Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, optimization strategies are generally based on the selection of spindle speed [23], which governs the frequency content of the cutting forces and thus could reduce vibration levels, without affecting productivity or altering system layout. However, the selection of spindle speed has conflicting requirements for forced and chatter vibrations.…”
Section: Optimization Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of the spindle speed can induce chatter, but the feed rate variation can hardly do that. Because the variation of the spindle speed is the variation of excitation frequency, the chatter will occur if the frequency is matched with a natural frequency of the workpiece, cutter or even machine tool [47]. However, the feed rate variation affects the value of the cutting force, which hardly conducts dynamic instability for a stable process.…”
Section: Vibration Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chatter prediction starts by calculating the FRF of the workpiece and tool-spindle using impact hammer test [15,26,30,31,36,37,38]. One point of the tool and different locations of the workpiece are hit, and excitation responses are recorded by accelerometers.…”
Section: Computational Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%