1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.1994.tb00189.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin Trading and the Estimation of Betas: The Efficacy of Alternative Techniques

Abstract: Infrequent trading induces biased estimates of the beta risk coefficient. This paper reports on the efficacy of approaches that seek to correct for this bias and documents the extent of thin trading among New Zealand securities. Parameter estimates free of the thin‐trading bias are obtained. These are compared with estimates obtained using ordinary least squares (OLS) applied in the conventional manner to nonsynchronous data, with and without bias‐correcting procedures. OLS beta estimates are found to be less … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A fuller description of these procedures may be found in the appendix. However, as found in other markets (Brown and Warner, 1985;Berry, Gallinger and Henderson, 1987;Berglund, Liljeblom and Löflund, 1989;Bartholdy and Riding, 1994;Boabang, 1996), these procedures do not alter this article's results in any significant way. Therefore, the paper reports market-model results only, but nonetheless comments on the few instances where the alternative procedures lead to different results.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A fuller description of these procedures may be found in the appendix. However, as found in other markets (Brown and Warner, 1985;Berry, Gallinger and Henderson, 1987;Berglund, Liljeblom and Löflund, 1989;Bartholdy and Riding, 1994;Boabang, 1996), these procedures do not alter this article's results in any significant way. Therefore, the paper reports market-model results only, but nonetheless comments on the few instances where the alternative procedures lead to different results.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…2 Fowler, Rorke, and Jog (1989) went on to demonstrate that neither model eliminated the biasing of betas. Cowan and Sergeant (1996) then provided corroboration of Brown and Warner's findings, reinforced by Bartholdy and Riding (1994), who showed that the market model produced betas that were as consistent as those of Scholes and Williams and of Dimson, while superior in efficiency and smallness of bias.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Evidence relating to the procedures for controlling for thin trading are not conclusive (Dimson & March, 1983;Berglund et al, 1989;Bartholdy & Riding, 1994;Louma et al, 1994). Bartholdy and Riding (1994) use a monthly return interval with an estimation period of five years in New Zealand and report no significant difference between the various control methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bartholdy and Riding (1994) use a monthly return interval with an estimation period of five years in New Zealand and report no significant difference between the various control methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%