2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin-shell mixing in radiative wind-shocks and the Lx  ∼  Lbol scaling of O-star X-rays

Abstract: X-ray satellites since Einstein have empirically established that the X-ray luminosity from single O-stars scales linearly with bolometric luminosity, L x ∼ 10 −7 L bol . But straightforward forms of the most favored model, in which X-rays arise from instabilitygenerated shocks embedded in the stellar wind, predict a steeper scaling, either with mass loss rate L x ∼Ṁ ∼ L 1.7 bol if the shocks are radiative, or with L x ∼Ṁ 2 ∼ L 3.4 bol if they are adiabatic. This paper presents a generalized formalism that bri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
95
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
12
95
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is significantly lower than the ∼ 10 −7 value expected for single O-type stars. This is in agreement with an expected steeper decline of the X-ray luminosity for the rather weak winds of single B-type star with respect to those of O-type stars (Berghoefer et al 1997;Owocki et al 2013).…”
Section: The Starssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is significantly lower than the ∼ 10 −7 value expected for single O-type stars. This is in agreement with an expected steeper decline of the X-ray luminosity for the rather weak winds of single B-type star with respect to those of O-type stars (Berghoefer et al 1997;Owocki et al 2013).…”
Section: The Starssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The latter value is in full agreement with the X-ray emission from a single O-type star (see e.g. Owocki et al 2013). …”
Section: The Starssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3) throughout the orbit, the shocks will be relatively smooth and we cannot appeal to thin-shell mixing, or oblique shock angles, caused by corrugated shock interfaces as a mechanism to reduce the intrinsic X-ray luminosity as these effects are typically associated with radiative shocks − see, e.g. , Owocki et al (2013), andKee et al (2014). Furthermore, although an under-estimate in the observationally inferred column density 5 would allow larger mass-loss rates, the over-prediction of the X-ray luminosity (which scales with the mass-loss rate) is unavoidable unless mass-loss rates are reduced.…”
Section: Constraining Wind Mass-loss Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are totals for the two components, treating each one as adhering to the relation for single stars. This canonical scaling for single stars is known to have significant dispersion, and its extension much into the B spectral class is recognized as dubious (e.g., Cohen et al 1997;Nazé 2009;Owocki et al 2013). …”
Section: Expected X-ray Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%