1997
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin-section CT obtained at 10-mm increments versus limited three-level thin-section CT for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: correlation with pathologic scoring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
302
2
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
12
302
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the radiological criteria for the diagnosis of UIP on HRCT were not mentioned in this latter study, it is not possible to explain the difference between their kw and those of MACDONALD et al [9], FLAHERTY et al [3] and the present study. Other studies [8,10,19,20], however, have found a higher level of agreement, but their study populations and the purposes for which observer variability were calculated differed significantly from those of the present study (table 4). AZIZ et al [21] found an observer agreement of 0.48 on the first-choice diagnosis in a cohort of 131 patients with diffuse parenchymal lung disease; the kw in the IPF cohort was 0.50.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Since the radiological criteria for the diagnosis of UIP on HRCT were not mentioned in this latter study, it is not possible to explain the difference between their kw and those of MACDONALD et al [9], FLAHERTY et al [3] and the present study. Other studies [8,10,19,20], however, have found a higher level of agreement, but their study populations and the purposes for which observer variability were calculated differed significantly from those of the present study (table 4). AZIZ et al [21] found an observer agreement of 0.48 on the first-choice diagnosis in a cohort of 131 patients with diffuse parenchymal lung disease; the kw in the IPF cohort was 0.50.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…An accurate and reproducible method allowing monitoring of fibrosis progression on HRCT would be a valuable surrogate marker of disease. Unfortunately, assessment of fibrosis volumes by expert radiologists has been hampered by substantial intra-and interobserver variability, and quantitative CT indices using fractal analysis and global histogram-based methods have not been validated or found helpful in clinical practice thus far [1,4,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. CALIPER is based on a texture-sensitive volumetric analysis that allows automated classification of lung parenchyma according to a database of HRCT volumes of interest validated by radiologists using data from the LTRC [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of emphysema and any coexisting pulmonary fibrosis were assessed using HRCT scan independently evaluated by two chest radiologists blinded to clinical data and each other's findings. A visual scale based on previous studies [4,20,21] was used to score the degree of parenchymal abnormality in the upper, mid and lower zone of each lung (05 ,5%, 155-25%, 2526-50%, 3551-75% and 4576-100%) for both emphysema and fibrosis. In order to assess the distribution of parenchymal disease on HRCT for the purpose of this study, the sum of the right and left upper zone scores was compared to the sum of the right and left lower zone scores for emphysema and fibrosis, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%