2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin film composite forward osmosis membranes based on polydopamine modified polysulfone substrates with enhancements in both water flux and salt rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
143
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
11
143
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2. Both pure PA TFC and GO modified TFC membranes displayed ridge-valley surface structure, similar to the structure observed on the surfaces of other TFC and thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes [17,[30][31][32]. Furthermore, the surface of the GO modified TFC membranes appeared to be denser than that of the pure PA TFC membrane.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Tfc/go Membranessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…2. Both pure PA TFC and GO modified TFC membranes displayed ridge-valley surface structure, similar to the structure observed on the surfaces of other TFC and thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes [17,[30][31][32]. Furthermore, the surface of the GO modified TFC membranes appeared to be denser than that of the pure PA TFC membrane.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Tfc/go Membranessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This may be attributed to the blocking of surface pores by the accumulation of coating material on membrane surface as confirmed by membranes surface morphologies. This result agree with literature [21], [38], [42] & [44].…”
Section: Water Uptake and Porosity Of Surface Fo Modified Membranesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Also, as illustrated previously, the decline of membrane performance by increasing coating concentration above 0.75 g/l can be attributed to the accumulation of coating material on membrane surface that leading to surface pores blocking as confirmed by membranes surface morphologies. This is in good agreement with literature [21], [38], [42] & [44]. In addition, it was observed that high flux value was obtained in the beginning of operation, then it decreased gradually by increasing of permeation time till 3 hours, this can be attributed to dilution of DS with time that reducing osmotic pressure difference.…”
Section: Water and Reverse Salt Flux At Different Additive Concentratsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…2017, 7, 81 9 of 15 surface roughness of the polydopamine-modified membrane is higher than the other membranes, the protein molecules cannot easily attach on the membrane surfaces. As suggested by Han et al [38], the pore size of the polydopamine-modified surfaces is around 1.5 nm. The dimension of the prolate ellipsoid BSA is 14 nm for the major axis and 4 nm for the minor axis [39], which is significantly larger than the pore size of the polydopamine.…”
Section: Filtration Performance Under Dark Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 63%