Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002.
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2002.1190687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thin-film and crystalline solar cell array system performance comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slow progress in thin-film efficiency over the past decades, contrasted with crystalline device performance gains, indicate that a space-worthy thin-film technology will not be coming soon. And even if a technology was available at low cost with efficiency as high as 15%, for large power needs the doubled array area would mean much more structure and harnessing mass, and would result in a heavier array [16] (for the same stiffness and strength) with a problematic moment of inertia (MOI), which degrades attitude control authority and consumes propellant at a greater rate.…”
Section: Figure 3 Space Photovoltaic Technology Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slow progress in thin-film efficiency over the past decades, contrasted with crystalline device performance gains, indicate that a space-worthy thin-film technology will not be coming soon. And even if a technology was available at low cost with efficiency as high as 15%, for large power needs the doubled array area would mean much more structure and harnessing mass, and would result in a heavier array [16] (for the same stiffness and strength) with a problematic moment of inertia (MOI), which degrades attitude control authority and consumes propellant at a greater rate.…”
Section: Figure 3 Space Photovoltaic Technology Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was determined that the UltraFlex solar array with triple-junction gallium arsenide cells, shown in Figure 25, was the best choice because it has extremely high power-to-weight ratio (Ref. 38).…”
Section: Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While silicon solar cells were initially used for space power, they were replaced by III-V based devices, first by the GaAs single junction cell [2] and then eventually by the previously mentioned triple junction cell. While the III-V devices were more expensive ($/Watt) than silicon on a bare cell level, at the array and panel level the III-V devices were a lower cost option [3,4]. This was due to the III-V device higher efficiency and superior radiation hardness compared to silicon, which led to smaller area arrays, with fewer cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%