2013
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thiessen polygons as a model for animal territory estimation

Abstract: Thiessen polygons are often used to model territory characteristics. However, information about the quality of Thiessen polygon-based estimates is currently lacking. We used published data to investigate the match between Thiessen polygons and mapped bird territories regarding territory size, shape and neighbourhood. Although territory sizes and the number of neighbours were strongly correlated between these two methods, both parameters were overestimated by the Thiessen polygons. Therefore, caution is require… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An inherent assumption of this Thiessen polygon method is that competition with adjacent neighbours governs territory formation (Schlicht et al., 2014) but there are likely to be additional mechanisms involved that can transcend territory boundaries such as song production or individual movement. Also, in other areas of the wood with a low density of occupied nestboxes, this Thiessen polygon approach tends to overestimate territory size (Schlicht et al., 2014), leading to some unrealistically large territories. As a result, numerous associations in these networks seem rather improbable given the considerable distance between some nestboxes.
Figure A2Comparison of male social networks in Wytham's great tit population generated using the (a) 5-nearest-neighbour method and (b) Thiessen polygon approach for a representative year (2006).
…”
Section: Comparison Of Nearest-neighbour and Thiessen Polygon Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inherent assumption of this Thiessen polygon method is that competition with adjacent neighbours governs territory formation (Schlicht et al., 2014) but there are likely to be additional mechanisms involved that can transcend territory boundaries such as song production or individual movement. Also, in other areas of the wood with a low density of occupied nestboxes, this Thiessen polygon approach tends to overestimate territory size (Schlicht et al., 2014), leading to some unrealistically large territories. As a result, numerous associations in these networks seem rather improbable given the considerable distance between some nestboxes.
Figure A2Comparison of male social networks in Wytham's great tit population generated using the (a) 5-nearest-neighbour method and (b) Thiessen polygon approach for a representative year (2006).
…”
Section: Comparison Of Nearest-neighbour and Thiessen Polygon Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is shown in Fig. 21, where we present nine slices at fixed values of m 2 (38) tend to overlap. We also observe that the boundary closer to the origin also seems to be singled out, especially at high values of m 2 .…”
Section: A Realistic Example With Tt Background and Combinatoricsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Voronoi tessellations For a basic introduction to Voronoi tessellations, see, e.g., [1] are useful in a wide variety of fields, from biology [2] to astronomy [3,4] to condensed matter physics [5]. In high energy physics, they have been used rather sporadically, e.g., as an optional approach to QCD jet-finding and area determination in FastJet [6] and in the model-independent definition of search regions in SLEUTH [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Schlicht et al . ), reports of overlapping home‐ranges (Engstrom & Sanders ) suggest the method could be flawed when applied to high‐density populations. We investigated RCW home‐range dynamics across a gradient of neighbouring group density conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%