1960
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-33-385-60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness of the Cortical Layer as an Estimate of Mineral Content of Human Finger Bones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

1966
1966
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…the rib (Nicholls & Nimalasuriya, 1939;Mitchell, Hamilton, Steggerda & Bean, 1945;Forbes, Cooper & Mitchell, 1953). In respect of the bones studied in the present investigation, there is a highly significant correlation (PcO*OOl) between cortical thickness of the finger bones and their actual mineral content (Virtama & Mahonen, 1960); further, when cortical index of humerus and femur were compared with their mineral contents, it was found that for the humerus a highly significant correlation(P<0401) prevailed, whereas for the femur the correlation was only just significant (P<0-05) (Virtama & Telkka, 1962). The three other indices described, cortical arealtotal area, cross-sectional area index and cortical/ surface area ratio, are believed to be truer reflections of bone mineral concentration than cortical index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…the rib (Nicholls & Nimalasuriya, 1939;Mitchell, Hamilton, Steggerda & Bean, 1945;Forbes, Cooper & Mitchell, 1953). In respect of the bones studied in the present investigation, there is a highly significant correlation (PcO*OOl) between cortical thickness of the finger bones and their actual mineral content (Virtama & Mahonen, 1960); further, when cortical index of humerus and femur were compared with their mineral contents, it was found that for the humerus a highly significant correlation(P<0401) prevailed, whereas for the femur the correlation was only just significant (P<0-05) (Virtama & Telkka, 1962). The three other indices described, cortical arealtotal area, cross-sectional area index and cortical/ surface area ratio, are believed to be truer reflections of bone mineral concentration than cortical index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Radiogrammetry is one of the oldest methods to assess an individual cortical bone partition with respect to osteopenia or osteoporosis [1,2]. The term "radiogrammetry" simply refers to measurement performed on a radiograph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inaccuracy of such an assessment is known to be high due to changed conditions for image capture and individual biological variations [6]. Originally proposed by Barnett and Nordin [7] and by Virtama and Mahonen [8], the use of radiographically assessed cortical bone thickness as estimation of bone strength became more important during the past decade [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%