2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa8795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness, morphology, and optoelectronic characteristics of pristine and surfactant-modified DNA thin films

Abstract: Although the preparation of DNA thin films with well-defined thicknesses controlled by simple physical parameters is crucial for constructing efficient, stable, and reliable DNAbased optoelectronic devices and sensors, it has not been comprehensively studied yet. Here, we construct DNA and surfactant-modified DNA thin films by drop-casting and spin-coating techniques. The DNA thin films formed with different control parameters, such as dropvolume and spin-speed at given DNA concentrations, exhibit characterist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FTIR absorbance of CDNA clearly showed characteristic peaks for sugar, phosphate groups (1250-600 cm À1 ), and nucleotide bases (1800-1300 cm À1 ); detailed mode assignments are shown in our previous report. 24 As expected, D ligands formed a stronger bond on the QD surface because they had more free electrons (about 2 times) than T. The optical properties of QDs with different ligands were found to be different due to the degree of surface passivation and dispersion in liquid and solid media. The PLQY of QD T and QD TD in the liquid phase and of QD T -CDNA and QD TD -CDNA in the solid phase is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ligand-dependent Plqy Characteristics Of Individual R G Ansupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FTIR absorbance of CDNA clearly showed characteristic peaks for sugar, phosphate groups (1250-600 cm À1 ), and nucleotide bases (1800-1300 cm À1 ); detailed mode assignments are shown in our previous report. 24 As expected, D ligands formed a stronger bond on the QD surface because they had more free electrons (about 2 times) than T. The optical properties of QDs with different ligands were found to be different due to the degree of surface passivation and dispersion in liquid and solid media. The PLQY of QD T and QD TD in the liquid phase and of QD T -CDNA and QD TD -CDNA in the solid phase is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ligand-dependent Plqy Characteristics Of Individual R G Ansupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecules, which have intrinsic optical characteristics (e.g., wide optical bandgap) and molecular recognition, provide a rigid platform for hosting various functional nanomaterials. [22][23][24][25] Owing to the high aspect ratio and helical structure of DNA, it can provide more room for embedding luminophores with less agglomeration. 26 In addition, DNA is advantageous for bio-optoelectronic applications with QD luminophores because of its biocompatible nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For C – V measurement, a DNA+NP thin layer placed on an indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass substrate (called the C – V device) is constructed. The average thicknesses of the DNA+NP and CDNA+NP layers are roughly 2 μm Figure b shows the absorbance spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After incubating V 3+ in the DNA solution, 20 μl of the sample solution was drop-cast on O 2 plasma-treated fused silica (for absorbance and Raman measurements), glass (energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), current, and magnetization), and indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass (capacitance) and allowed to dry naturally. The final thickness of V 3+ -doped DNA layers was 1.5 μm [33] (figure 1).…”
Section: Fabrication Of V 3+ -Doped Dna Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%