2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.9.044044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness Dependence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Co2FeAl Ultrathin Films: Effects of Annealing Temperature and Heavy-Metal Material

Abstract: The interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (iDMI) has been investigated in Co 2 FeAl (CFA) ultrathin films of various thicknesses (0.8 nm≤t CFA ≤2 nm) grown by sputtering on Si substrates, using Pt, W, Ir and MgO buffer or/and capping layers. Vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) revealed that magnetization at saturation (M s ) for the Pt and Ir buffered films is higher than the usual M s of CFA due to the proximity induced magnetization (PIM) in Ir and Pt, estimated to be 19% and 27%, respectively. The p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their isotropic structure helps with avoiding defect pinning 18 , while their intrinsic perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) 3235 helps stabilize small skyrmions by allowing the use of thicker films (>5 nm). However, the effectiveness of interfacial DMI decreases significantly away from the interface 2831 , which is the focus of our present investigation. Besides PMA, the magnetization of RE-TM alloys vanishes at the compensation temperature 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their isotropic structure helps with avoiding defect pinning 18 , while their intrinsic perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) 3235 helps stabilize small skyrmions by allowing the use of thicker films (>5 nm). However, the effectiveness of interfacial DMI decreases significantly away from the interface 2831 , which is the focus of our present investigation. Besides PMA, the magnetization of RE-TM alloys vanishes at the compensation temperature 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Thicker magnetic layers are required in most cases to increase stability 17,18 . However, for ferromagnet (FM)/heavy metal multilayer stacks, increase in thickness of the magnetic layer can lead to a loss of interfacial anisotropy and the reduction of the strength of average DMI 2831 , both of which are critical for skyrmion formation. To overcome these challenges, we need to consider a suite of materials and understand their underlying physics, especially with varying film thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[129] Moreover, the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (iDMI) was investigated in CFA ultrathin films of various thicknesses and with various buffer layers by measuring spin waves with Brillouin light scattering (BLS). [130,131] And the current-induced dipolar magnetic skyrmions in Co-based Heusler alloy CFA at room temperature have been reported by Husain et al [132] and Akhtar et al [133] Although they did not observe a clear skyrmion Hall effect [134] in this system due to the pinning effects, it is still very promising to explore the efficient skyrmion motion in Heusler alloys where the stabilization of magnetic skyrmions under ambient conditions is possible.…”
Section: Hall (And Related) Effectsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…[ 129 ] Moreover, the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (iDMI) was investigated in CFA ultrathin films of various thicknesses and with various buffer layers by measuring spin waves with Brillouin light scattering (BLS). [ 130,131 ] And the current‐induced dipolar magnetic skyrmions in Co‐based Heusler alloy CFA at room temperature have been reported by Husain et al. [ 132 ] and Akhtar et al.…”
Section: Magnetic Thermoelectric and Transport Properties Of Co‐basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. For samples where the MS-FMR signal is not enough to be detected, BLS measurements were used to determine M eff as described in [30]. Positive values of M eff correspond to in-plane spontaneously magnetized films (IPM) while negative values refer to out-of-plane spontaneously magnetized samples (OPM).…”
Section: Bls and Ms-fmr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%