1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.35.9368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness dependence of optical gap and void fraction for sputtered amorphous germanium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There seems to be almost no systematic relation between the mass densities of our Ge films and the process parameters, apart from slightly higher values for the Ge films grown by sputtering with Xe (average density 4.35 g/cm 3 ) than for sputtering with Ar (average density 4.26 g/cm 3 ). Some groups reported that the mass density of amorphous Ge films depends on film thickness or growth rate [15,[20][21][22]. This is not found here, most likely due to the smaller film thickness and growth rates, which are typically lower for ion beam sputter deposition than for evaporation or magnetron sputtering.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…There seems to be almost no systematic relation between the mass densities of our Ge films and the process parameters, apart from slightly higher values for the Ge films grown by sputtering with Xe (average density 4.35 g/cm 3 ) than for sputtering with Ar (average density 4.26 g/cm 3 ). Some groups reported that the mass density of amorphous Ge films depends on film thickness or growth rate [15,[20][21][22]. This is not found here, most likely due to the smaller film thickness and growth rates, which are typically lower for ion beam sputter deposition than for evaporation or magnetron sputtering.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Indeed, the reference sample analyzed with Cody plot gives invariably E g lower than 0.8 eV (from 0.6 eV to 0.7 eV), which does not agree with theory and experimental results on a-Ge (E g is around 0.8 eV). 17,33 It should be noted that while Cody plot gave some reliable results for a-Si, 18,21 this is not always true for other semiconductors, especially in a confined system. a-Si film is characterized by large tails in the bandgap, probably weakening the validity of Tauc assumption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that thickness dependence of band gaps of ultrathin amorphous materials can be described by the ODQC effect. 13,16 Figure 4 shows the bandgap energy of the IGZO thin films yielded from the SE modelling. A significant dependence of bandgap on film thickness is observed.…”
Section: Ellipsometric Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%