Abstract:In investigations of conductivity of semiconducting thin films it i s generally supposed that the concentration of electrons is independent of film thickness and that the mobility of electrons does not depend on film thickness if the mean free path of the electrons i s smaller than film thickness. Experimental results, e. g. on thin films of germanium (l), lead telluride (2). tellurium (3), and cadmium sulphide (4). in which a dependence of carrier concentration and mobility on film thickness was observed for … Show more
“…Our electron microscopic investigations [ 5 ] and those of Shallcross [B], showing a n increase in crystallite size with growing film thickness, and the electron diffraction investigations of very thin ( t = 1000 A) CdS films by Addiss [3],…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The thicknesses of the polycrystalline films obtained by evaporation were 0.1 to 5 pm, their deposition rates varied from 1 to 20 Kjs. The mean crystallite size increased with film thickness t and reached values of about 1 pm [ 5 ] . All the films annealed a t 700 "C in argon as well as in vacuum showed after recrystallization, independent of deposition rate and film thickness, a considerable increase in mean crystallite size together with a change in orientation of the crystallites.…”
CdS thin films deposited onto substrates of supremax glass and fused silica were annealed at temperatures of about 700 °C in vacuum or argon atmosphere. Annealing of the samples resulted in a secondary recrystallization due to texture leading to the occurrence of monocrystalline regions with diameters up to a few millimetres. The recrystallization behaviour is similar to that observed by Gilles and Van Cakenberghe [1] and Vecht and Apling [2], however avoids strong doping connected with the technique used by these authors. The presence of oxygen or vapour of one of the components of CdS during annealing prevents the samples from secondary recrystallization, whereas covering of the CdS film with a thin silver film lowers the activation energy of recrystallization and enables therefore recrystallization at lower temperatures.
“…Our electron microscopic investigations [ 5 ] and those of Shallcross [B], showing a n increase in crystallite size with growing film thickness, and the electron diffraction investigations of very thin ( t = 1000 A) CdS films by Addiss [3],…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The thicknesses of the polycrystalline films obtained by evaporation were 0.1 to 5 pm, their deposition rates varied from 1 to 20 Kjs. The mean crystallite size increased with film thickness t and reached values of about 1 pm [ 5 ] . All the films annealed a t 700 "C in argon as well as in vacuum showed after recrystallization, independent of deposition rate and film thickness, a considerable increase in mean crystallite size together with a change in orientation of the crystallites.…”
CdS thin films deposited onto substrates of supremax glass and fused silica were annealed at temperatures of about 700 °C in vacuum or argon atmosphere. Annealing of the samples resulted in a secondary recrystallization due to texture leading to the occurrence of monocrystalline regions with diameters up to a few millimetres. The recrystallization behaviour is similar to that observed by Gilles and Van Cakenberghe [1] and Vecht and Apling [2], however avoids strong doping connected with the technique used by these authors. The presence of oxygen or vapour of one of the components of CdS during annealing prevents the samples from secondary recrystallization, whereas covering of the CdS film with a thin silver film lowers the activation energy of recrystallization and enables therefore recrystallization at lower temperatures.
“…Berger [62,87] showed that the Hall coefficient and the carrier concentrations also exhibit exponential dependences, similar to that of Eq.…”
Section: Initial Representationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…PbS [39,57], CdS [29,30,[58][59][60][61][62][63], CdSe [64], CdTe [65], GaAs [66,67], and several other semiconductor thin films [68][69][70][71][72]. For the first example, Fig.…”
“…In the early work, the importance of all the parameters which influence the properties of an evaporated film was not fully appreciated. In evaporated CdS and CdSe films, size dependence of resistivity was suggested by Berger et al 4 Bartran et al 5 have studied the dependence of transport properties on film thickness in polycrystalline CdS films through Hall effect measurements and showed that the variation of carrier concentration and mobility with film thickness is similar to the grain size dependence on thickness. Ray et al 6 studied the temperature dependence of electrical resistivity of CdS films and discussed the role of excess cadmium formed in the film during deposition.…”
Polycrystalline cadmium sulphide (CdS) and cadmium selenide (CdSe) films are deposited on glass substrates kept at room temperature using the method of resistive heating. In this article, the influence of substrate vibrations at ultrasonic frequency during deposition on the electrical properties of the films is discussed. The resistivity of the films has been studied as a function of temperature, and the activation energies have been determined for the films deposited on a vibrating substrate and on a static substrate. It is found that the carrier concentration is less in the case of the films deposited on vibrating substrate although the activation energy remains unaltered. This result is in agreement with the carrier concentration determined from Hall effect measurements on these films. The vibration of the substrate leads to better stoichiometry and crystallinity in the films as confirmed by x-ray diffraction studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.