2020
DOI: 10.1086/704761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness and Information in Dynamic Matching Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
122
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 While our description above applies in many situations, there are several exceptions and limitations. For instance, for organ transplants appointments are made using a dynamic matching procedure that weights waiting for more available organs in order to create a larger compatibility pool against greedily matching and assigning the next-available appointment (Akbarpour et al, 2016). Emergency room rules for dealing with life threatening situations are also different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 While our description above applies in many situations, there are several exceptions and limitations. For instance, for organ transplants appointments are made using a dynamic matching procedure that weights waiting for more available organs in order to create a larger compatibility pool against greedily matching and assigning the next-available appointment (Akbarpour et al, 2016). Emergency room rules for dealing with life threatening situations are also different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complementary class dynamic matching model examine one‐time matchings that arise over multiple periods. Here, focus has ranged from questions of preference formation (Kadam, ) and unraveling (Roth and Xing, ) to managing the (stochastic) arrival and departure of agents or objects (Ünver, ; Baccara et al., ; Thakral, ; Akbarpour et al., ; Leshno, ). Doval () examines an economy of this latter type and independently proposes a definition of “dynamic stability,” which is distinct from our proposal.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 More precisely, Akbarpour et al (2017), in the spirit of an organ exchange application such as the 'kidney exchange', identify the optimal mechanism to maximize the number of matches, that is, to minimize the number of agents perishing resulting from failing to get recipients matched with donors in time. In the model of Akbarpour et al (2017), agents from both sides of the market arrive and leave stochastically and all carry identical match values, i.e., they are of the same type (in the spirit of each life being worth the same). However, there are two types of agents, as some matches are feasible and others are infeasible, thus rendering some agents easier -others harder -to match.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are two types of agents, as some matches are feasible and others are infeasible, thus rendering some agents easier -others harder -to match. 6 The optimal mechanism identified by Akbarpour et al (2017) minimizes the number of unmatched patients based on information concerning arrivals and departures, which may involve delaying compatible matches. Without such information, greedy scheduling is always optimal in this setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%