2016
DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness and Diameter in Melanoma: Is There a Relation?

Abstract: There was a statistically significant, but small, correlation between Breslow's thickness and diameter in skin melanomas. Moreover, a non-negligible proportion of small lesions were thick and/or nodular.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of any significant correlation between Breslow thickness and melanoma diameter in the current study contrasts with findings in a study in Tuscany of 2071 melanomas, which found a statistically significant, but small correlation ( r = 0.39) 23 . However, they also found that a non‐negligible proportion of small melanomas was thick and/or nodular, this being consistent with 34.5% of primary melanomas < 6 mm in diameter in the current study being invasive (Table ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of any significant correlation between Breslow thickness and melanoma diameter in the current study contrasts with findings in a study in Tuscany of 2071 melanomas, which found a statistically significant, but small correlation ( r = 0.39) 23 . However, they also found that a non‐negligible proportion of small melanomas was thick and/or nodular, this being consistent with 34.5% of primary melanomas < 6 mm in diameter in the current study being invasive (Table ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies have generally shown positive correlation between Breslow thickness and diameter, 19 small size does not exclude invasion 20–24 . In the present study, two dermoscopic features, i.e., blue‐white veil and negative pigment network, were associated with invasion in melanomas measuring ≤5 mm.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…It can therefore be considered that their diagnosis was delayed. 3 , 4 , 5 Patients may also have experienced diagnostic delays because they were afraid of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2, underestimated the seriousness of their skin lesion, or did not seek care for small, asymptomatic, or hidden lesions. 6 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%