1976
DOI: 10.1002/bip.1976.360150204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness and density of protein films by optical mixing spectroscopy

Abstract: SynopsisThe adsorption of protein films on polystyrene latex spheres was studied by optical mixing spectroscopy. With this technique, we show that both the hydrodynamic thickness of protein films and their optical density can be measured. Thus, we found that films of the glycoproteins isolated from the human erythrocyte membrane were four times as thick as films of either human serum albumin or bovine serum albumin for about the same surface coverage. This result suggests an end-on orientation for the adsorbed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to their fidelity with the measured mobilityionic strength curve, further evidence supporting the predictions of our model comes from Uzgiris and Fromageot (1976), who measured the hydrodynamic thickness of protein films adsorbed on polystyrene latex spheres. The FIGURE 7 Plot of ratio u(z)/E (fluid velocity per electric field) in gm s-V`cm, as a function of z, where u(z) is given by Eqs.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In addition to their fidelity with the measured mobilityionic strength curve, further evidence supporting the predictions of our model comes from Uzgiris and Fromageot (1976), who measured the hydrodynamic thickness of protein films adsorbed on polystyrene latex spheres. The FIGURE 7 Plot of ratio u(z)/E (fluid velocity per electric field) in gm s-V`cm, as a function of z, where u(z) is given by Eqs.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This equation is valid for d A <£ s. It will be noticed that there is a contradiction between the condition s <^ A used in obtaining equations (19)(20), and the condition d A -4 s. The first implies that the colloidal particles should have a radius less than A/20 ~ 30 nm, which is not much bigger than the value of d A expected from proteins ~ 10 nm in diameter (and which, moreover, may lead to the complications in the adsorption behaviour referred to earlier 3 ). For larger particles the full Mie theory should be used to obtain equations corresponding to equations (19) to (20); numerical simulations show, however, that the error introduced through using equation (19) may be less than typical experimental errors (Uzgiris & Fromageot, 1976). Sedimentation.…”
Section: Jjramsdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For measuring D of small colloidal particles a million channels of duration o-i ms would be typical measurement parameters. Uzgiris & Fromageot (1976) have pointed out that the thickness d A which is required in order to be able to determine 8 or F from D (equations 11-14) can be obtained from the way the scattered light intensity / s changes as a film is adsorbed onto the particle surface. Provided that s <£ A, the polarizability a F of the naked sphere is, according to the Rayleigh approximation, a F = 5 3 (n F -n%)Hn% + zn%).…”
Section: The Diffusivity Of Colloidal Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of investigations have been made on protein adsorption on at solid-liquid interfaces by estimating the free energy of protein adsorption and determining its adsorption mode (Lyman et al, 1968;Dillonman and Miller, 1973;Nyilas et al, 1974;Lee and Kim, 1974;Brash et al, 1974;Chiu et al, 1976;Uzgiris and Fromageot, 1976;Norde and Lyklema, 1978a-e;Soberquist and Walton, 1980;Bagchi and Birnbaum, 1981;Chan and Brash, 1981;Dulm et al, 1981;Dulm and Norde, 1983;Schmidt et al, 1983;Shirahama and Shuzawa, 1985).…”
Section: Blood Protein-solid Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%