2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2016.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness and annealing effects on thermally evaporated InZnO thin films for gas sensors and blue, green and yellow emissive optical devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was evident that the surface morphology changed upon thermal treatment, and that surface roughness increased. This type of modified surface is associated with optimized trace gas detection due to shifts in the absorption spectra of the gas sensors [ 34 ], as can be seen in the bar graph ( Figure 3 ) and the AFM images ( Figure 4 ). Moreover, the AFM results in Figure 4 indicate that the thermal treatment has an effect on the structure and surface area on gas sensing films, leading to an increase of surface roughness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was evident that the surface morphology changed upon thermal treatment, and that surface roughness increased. This type of modified surface is associated with optimized trace gas detection due to shifts in the absorption spectra of the gas sensors [ 34 ], as can be seen in the bar graph ( Figure 3 ) and the AFM images ( Figure 4 ). Moreover, the AFM results in Figure 4 indicate that the thermal treatment has an effect on the structure and surface area on gas sensing films, leading to an increase of surface roughness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to existing research, the temperature used in thin film preparation affects the morphology of the film’s surface [ 33 ]. Therefore, increasing the surface area of films generally enhances the rate of a chemical vapor reaction [ 34 ], which leads to the significant increase in the sensor’s response, as shown in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation