2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-019-0405-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thick ice deposits in shallow simple craters on the Moon and Mercury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential volume of the micro cold traps is even smaller, scaling as ~D 3 , and we find that those with D < 1 m could account for ~10 −5 of the total cold-trapping volume, despite being vastly more numerous than larger cold traps. Thus, the potential presence of ice deposits tens of metres thick in the Moon's south polar region 35 is consistent with our finding that large >1-km-scale cold traps are more prevalent in the south than the north, dominating the cold-trapping volume.…”
Section: Calculation Of Shadow Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The potential volume of the micro cold traps is even smaller, scaling as ~D 3 , and we find that those with D < 1 m could account for ~10 −5 of the total cold-trapping volume, despite being vastly more numerous than larger cold traps. Thus, the potential presence of ice deposits tens of metres thick in the Moon's south polar region 35 is consistent with our finding that large >1-km-scale cold traps are more prevalent in the south than the north, dominating the cold-trapping volume.…”
Section: Calculation Of Shadow Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…If instead of extensive Mercury‐like surface deposits, ancient lunar ice was buried under meters of regolith (e.g., Rubanenko et al, ), and if cohesive ice deposits exist at depths between 1 and 10 m, the surface ice we observe may be the result of secondary impact gardening up‐sampling that ice during the Copernican era. Our gardening calculations at high probability give a lower limit on the depth of up‐sampled ice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…At the surface, evidence of patchy surface water that covers roughly 10% of the total PSR area has been presented by workers using LRO Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter reflectance measurements, LRO Lyman Alpha Mapping Project UV spectra, and Chandrayan Moon Mineral Mapper infrared spectra, coupled with temperature data from the LRO Diviner thermal radiometer (e.g., Fisher et al, ; Hayne et al, ; Li et al, ; Milliken & Li, ; Zuber et al, ). A statistical approach by Rubanenko et al () concluded that craters in the south lunar polar region have relatively low depth‐diameter ratios and suggested that the shallowing is caused by buried ice; however, because of the statistical nature of the work, they could not identify individual shallowed candidate carters, and the mystery of why there might be an asymmetric distribution of water by any source between the north and south poles remains a mystery and concern. While the Moon's poles are not completely dry, the limited distribution and quantity of water ice are in stark contrast with Mercury's extensive icy deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have applied techniques from geomorphic analysis to address the question of lunar ice (Deutsch et al., 2020; Rubanenko et al., 2019). On Earth and other solar system bodies, quantitative landform analysis has proven valuable for identifying the presence of near‐surface ice deposits or ice‐rich surface materials (Boeckli et al., 2012; Kreslavsky & Head, 2000; Mangold, 2003; Mahaney et al., 2007; Rossbacher & Judson, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%