Diabetes insipidus (DI) is a temporary or chronic disorder characterized by the excretion of excessive quantities of very dilute, but otherwise normal urine. The disease results either from impaired synthesis and secretion of antidiuretic hormone (ADH, vasopressin) by the hypothalamus and posterior pituitary, respectively (central DI), or from an unresponsiveness of the kidneys to the hormone itself (nephrogenic DI) (1-3). The renal water transport defect is located in the collecting system (i.e. the connecting tubule -CNT and the collecting duct -CD) in which vasopressin normally controls the expression and cell surface targeting of the apical water channel aquaporin-2 (AQP2) (4). The CNT and CD are also the site of amiloridesensitive sodium reabsorption via the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) (5). Sodium transport across ENaC may osmotically drive transepithelial water reabsorption. Consistently, both AQP2 and ENaC are regulated by vasopressin via V2-receptordependent cAMP production (4,5). While exogenous application of vasopressin efficiently corrects the reduced AQP2 expression and the urinary concentration defect in central DI (4), the treatment of nephrogenic DI is usually less obvious and may include different approaches such as dietary sodium restriction, prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, potassium-sparing diuretics and/or thiazide diuretics (3,6). The use of diuretics for the treatment of a polyuric disease appears paradoxical, but the beneficial effect of thiazides has now been proven for more than 45 yr. In 1959, Crawford and Kennedy showed in a seminal paper that thiazides reduce polyuria and increase urine osmolality in DI (7). Since then, thiazides have become an important component in the therapeutic repertoire for treatment of DI. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms by which thiazide diuretics elicit their paradoxical anti-diuretic effect in DI are still largely elusive.Thiazide diuretics inhibit the NaCl co-transporter (NCC/ TSC) in the renal distal convoluted tubule (DCT) (8). The DCT is water impermeable and considered to be part of the diluting segment (8). Therefore, the water-preserving effect of thiazides is unlikely related to a direct effect on the DCT. In fact, the most widely accepted hypothesis suggests that the antidiuretic action of thiazides is secondary to increased renal sodium excretion (1,2,6). The renal sodium loss causes extracellular volume contraction leading to lowered GFR and increased proximal tubular sodium and water reabsorption. Hence, less water and solutes are delivered to the distal tubule and collecting duct and are lost as urine (1,2,6). Indeed, micropuncture and renal clearance studies on normal rats (9 -11) or rats with DI (12,13) support this hypothesis. However, there is also increasing evidence that sodium depletion and increased proximal water reabsorption does not solely account for the antidiuretic effect. Spannow et al. demonstrated that the replacement of renal sodium losses by a servo-controlled system does not prevent the acute antidiuretic effe...