2001
DOI: 10.15232/s1080-7446(15)31623-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thiamin Status and Growth Performance of Cattle New to the Feedlot Environment as Affected by Amprolium and Supplemental Dietary Thiamin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of Silzell et al. ( 2001 ), a total of 96 mix‐breed cattle for fattening were distributed in four dietary treatments (24 animals/treatment), each including four pens with six animals. Two controls and two treatment groups, which involved the dietary administration of amprolium (unspecified chemical form; Amprolium 1.25% Cattle Pellets; Nutra Blend Corp) at a concentration of 5 mg/kg initial body weight (BW) (equivalent to 250 mg/kg dry matter (DM), using the default value 20 g DM intake/kg BW, 8 initial BW 211 kg), with or without supplementation with thiamine at 140 mg/kg DM.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study of Silzell et al. ( 2001 ), a total of 96 mix‐breed cattle for fattening were distributed in four dietary treatments (24 animals/treatment), each including four pens with six animals. Two controls and two treatment groups, which involved the dietary administration of amprolium (unspecified chemical form; Amprolium 1.25% Cattle Pellets; Nutra Blend Corp) at a concentration of 5 mg/kg initial body weight (BW) (equivalent to 250 mg/kg dry matter (DM), using the default value 20 g DM intake/kg BW, 8 initial BW 211 kg), with or without supplementation with thiamine at 140 mg/kg DM.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study reporting the effect of oral administration of amprolium is available for cattle for fattening (Silzell et al., 2001 ), from which the concentration of 250 mg/kg DM did not show a growth‐promoting effect.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%