“They Just Don’t Stand for Nothing”: LGBT Christians’ Definitions of Non-Religious Others

Abstract

In this exploratory study, I examine how a group of LGBT Christians conceptualized non-religious others. Based on over 450 hours of fieldwork in an LGBT Christian church located in the southeastern region of the United States, I demonstrate how a group of LGBT Christians defined non-religious others as (1) morally suspect and untrustworthy, (2) in need of salvation and guidance, and (3) poor representations of the LGBT community. Although these LGBT Christians used "non-religious" as a catchall term without ever specifying exactly who it captured, they used the first two definitions to apply to non-religious people in general regardless of sexuality while explicitly focusing on non-religious sexual minorities in their third definition. Moreover, I show how these definitions echoed mainstream religious rhetoric in America used to marginalize both sexual and religious minorities. In conclusion, I draw out two central implications of this work: (1) how religious depictions of non-religious people may reproduce societal patterns of inequality; and (2) the importance of analyzing how religious people define and interpret non-religious others.

Memahami Peran Generasi dalam Tonggak Kepemimpinan: Menavigasi Tantangan dan Peluang Gereja di Era Digital Sebagai Bagian dari Relevansi Pelayanan

“…Dalam kurun waktu lima belas tahun berikutnya tahun berikutnya, kelompok-kelompok ini berkembang menjadi sebuah organisasi yang membeli tanahnya sendiri dan sekarang mengadakan berbagai bentuk berbagai bentuk kebaktian mingguan (Sumerau, 2016).…”

Sexual identity and religious endorsement: The role of image of god and belief in punitive religious constructs.

“…Despite these trends, many SM people still engage with religion (Sumerau, 2016), consider themselves spiritual, and successfully integrate the two identities (Fuist, 2016; Rodriguez, 2009, Rodriguez & Ouellette, 2000). Further, for some samples of SM participants, maintaining spirituality relates to improved well-being and better mental health outcomes (Lease et al, 2005; Lefevor et al, 2020; Rosenkrantz et al, 2016).…”

Being Different with Dignity: Buddhist Inclusiveness of Homosexuality

“…Furthermore, risks of HIV infection in this population (Carneiro et al 2003) worsen such phobias, especially towards homosexually-active individuals (Bonell et al 2000). As a result, poor representations invoke stigmatisation (Srivastava and Singh 2015;Whitehead et al 2016) and inequality (Sumerau 2016). Inadequate training among healthcare providers creates health inequity (Dionne 2002) and lessens available healthcare for this vulnerable group (Logie et al 2012).…”