2005
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4283-04.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theta Stimulation Polymerizes Actin in Dendritic Spines of Hippocampus

Abstract: It has been proposed that the endurance of long-term potentiation (LTP) depends on structural changes entailing reorganization of the spine actin cytoskeleton. The present study used a new technique involving intracellular and extracellular application of rhodaminephalloidin to conventional hippocampal slices to test whether induction of LTP by naturalistic patterns of afferent activity selectively increases actin polymerization in juvenile to young adult spines. Rhodamine-phalloidin, which selectively binds t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
150
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
16
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After TBP, there is an immediate increase in both spine size and EPSPs. The former is presumably attributable to rapid actin remodeling, at least partially mediated by cofilin inactivation, occurring seconds to minutes after LTP induction (4,5,20,24,(32)(33)(34), and the latter likely to rapid phosphorylation of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) (35). The MMP blockers had no effect on the immediate, TBP-triggered changes in spine size and potentiation, indicating that such rapid plasticity is mechanistically independent of MMP proteolysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After TBP, there is an immediate increase in both spine size and EPSPs. The former is presumably attributable to rapid actin remodeling, at least partially mediated by cofilin inactivation, occurring seconds to minutes after LTP induction (4,5,20,24,(32)(33)(34), and the latter likely to rapid phosphorylation of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) (35). The MMP blockers had no effect on the immediate, TBP-triggered changes in spine size and potentiation, indicating that such rapid plasticity is mechanistically independent of MMP proteolysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, actin depolymerizing agents dramatically reduce the amount of CaMKII␣ found at spines (Allison et al, 2000;Asrican et al, 2006). Importantly, the amount of F-actin in spines increases after LTP induction (Okamoto et al, 2004;Lin et al, 2005) providing more targets for CaMKII binding. This binding is likely to contribute to the increase in the BA of CaMKII after LTP and for the correlation of the BA with spine size reported in this study.…”
Section: Camkii Content and Spine Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An enhanced density of the kinase at the PSD (Otmakhov et al, 2004) and kinase self-association (Hudmon et al, 2005) may account for the excessive amount of bound CaMKII responsible for the increased BF. Slowly this excessive amount may leave the spine, bringing the BF back to the initial prepotentiated level while the BA of CaMKII remains elevated proportionally with the increased PSD (Ostroff et al, 2002) and F-actin mesh (Lin et al, 2005).…”
Section: Bf Of Camkii Is Independent Of Spine Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prefer the original Lynch and Baudry proposal that changes in receptor number are secondary to changes in the size of the synaptic zone (the post synaptic density, psd), which themselves are secondary to alterations in spine morphology. The original impetus for this idea came from ultrastructural studies showing that shifts in spine and psd morphology accompany LTP (Lee et al, 1980), an observation subsequently greatly expanded by analyses with electron microscopic (Yuste and Bonhoeffer, 2001 for review) and newly developed light microscopic Lin et al, 2005) methods.…”
Section: Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%