“These Days of<i>Shoah</i>”: History, Habitus, and Realpolitik in Jewish Palestine, 1942–1943

Levine, Daniel

doi:10.1108/s0198-871920170000032005

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, why should North Korea continue to engage in the field of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) Treaty when its disposition, stemming from the acquired nuclear missiles, has changed dramatically? Researchers analyze the habitus of decision-makers in security communities [Bjola, Kornprobst 2007;Mérand 2010], on the eve of and during military operations [Gutkowski 2012], in diplomacy [Neumann, Pouliot 2011], or how habitus determines a state's position on particular historical issues [Levine 2017].…”

Section: практики глобального кризисаmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crisis as practice: routinizing Russia – U.S. security rivalries

Neklyudov,

Baykov,

Shchekin

2023

Полис

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article contributes to the debate on how an international crisis may contribute to ontological security. We argue that ontological security can paradoxically be achieved through escalating practices capable of provoking international crises. By merging ‘practices’, a fairly distinct theoretical perspective of International Relations, with ontological security, we seek to expand Jennifer Mitzen’s premise that “even dangerous routines provide ontological security” and consider practices as a source of attaining ontological security. To partake in the practical turn in ontological security studies, we borrow the concepts of Practice Turn in IR, habitus (disposition), and field (environment). After substantiating the connection between the two theories, we take the demise of the INF Treaty as an example of a crisis. We argue that the INF Treaty, as a field, has become a source of ontological threat to both the U.S. and Russia. Following the end of the Cold War, the U.S. and Russia have constantly changed their habitus by developing key missile technologies and deteriorating bilateral relations. Accordingly, the changed habitus no longer conformed to the realities of the field, making its delegitimization by both sides self-evident.

show abstract

Section: практики глобального кризисаmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crisis as practice: routinizing Russia – U.S. security rivalries

Neklyudov,

Baykov,

Shchekin

2023

Полис

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Threat inflation as political melodrama: ISIS and the politics of late modern fear

Levine

2018

Critical Studies on Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The International Origins of Social and Political Theory

Barkawi

Lawson²

2017

International Origins of Social and Political Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article introduces the main themes that animate this special issue: the necessary entanglement of theory and history, the cortical relationship between theory and practice, and the transboundary (i.e. international) relations that help to constitute systems of both thought and practice. We integrate the contributions to the special issue within these overarching themes and identify their main contributions. We make three core arguments: first, all theory is situated knowledge, derived in and through historical context; second, theory-practice is a single field in which theory arises out of and acts upon historical experience; and third, both social and political theory have international origins, arising from transboundary encounters.

show abstract

“These Days ofShoah”: History, Habitus, and Realpolitik in Jewish Palestine, 1942–1943

Cited by 4 publications

References 41 publications

Crisis as practice: routinizing Russia – U.S. security rivalries

Crisis as practice: routinizing Russia – U.S. security rivalries

Threat inflation as political melodrama: ISIS and the politics of late modern fear

The International Origins of Social and Political Theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About