Conference on Advanced Technology for Future Space Systems 1979
DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermostructural analysis of three structural concepts for reusable space vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TPS system concepts (Fig. 9) that may be used for hypersonic transportation (both HST and TAV/ATAV) have been verified by rigorous tests at temperatures beyond 1500 K [22,23].…”
Section: Materials Structures and Thermal Protectionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TPS system concepts (Fig. 9) that may be used for hypersonic transportation (both HST and TAV/ATAV) have been verified by rigorous tests at temperatures beyond 1500 K [22,23].…”
Section: Materials Structures and Thermal Protectionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Typical optimized thermostrucutural design solutions for the critcal Integral Hydrogen Fuel Tank of a HST/TAV are shown in Fig. 11 [22].…”
Section: Unit Mass Of Optimised Thermostructural Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was used to represent the heat sink capacity of the vehicle structure. 7 The back surface of the structure was in all cases assumed to be adiabatic (no active cooling was considered). The initial temperature throughout the surface was assumed to be 3UK (100°F), a value shown in previous studies to be consistent with typical vehicle attitude, orbital inclinations, and thermal control on orbit.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For use as a primary structure, L-605 was assumed to have a maximum temperature capability of 1089K (1500°F), corresponding to the temperature at which the material retains about 40% of its room-temperature mechanical properties. The Ren£ 41 honeycomb mass per unit area was determined from previous studies, 7 and the values for other metallic systems were again related to this value based upon their strength-to-density ratios at operating temperature. The sizing criteria for the Ren£ 41 hot structure and the aluminum cold structure should be consistent as they were derived from the same study.…”
Section: Materials Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10, have been the subject of a recent analytical study. 50 All of the concepts have been sized for a horizontal takeoff, turbojet-boosted spacejet application. The concept, which uses closed-cell organic form to perform the allimportant function of eliminating cryopumping, is the heaviest of the three and represents the current state-of-theart.…”
Section: Tankage Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%