Current investigation of RNA transcriptomes relies heavily on the use of retroviral reverse transcriptases. It is well known that these enzymes have many limitations because of their intrinsic properties. This commentary highlights the recent biochemical characterization of a new family of reverse transcriptases, those encoded by group II intron retrohoming elements. The novel properties of these enzymes endow them with the potential to revolutionize how we approach RNA analyses.Keywords: RNA-seq; noncoding RNA; reverse transcriptase; template switchingIn biology, even hallowed rules like the central dogma have exceptions. Parallel to evolutionary diversification of the DNAtemplated polymerases necessary for genome replication and expression, RNA-templated DNA and RNA polymerases are also evolutionarily diverse and widespread (Ng et al. 2008;Finnegan 2012). Among the polymerases that counter the central dogma flow, the best known are the reverse transcriptases (RTs). The initial discoveries of retrovirally encoded RT activity and function were recognized with the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Recombinant retroviral RTs and their laboratory derivatives have been crucial research tools for molecular biologists for decades.RTs other than retroviral family members are less well understood in structure or enzymology and have not yet been harnessed for commercial or medical diagnostic applications. One example is telomerase RT (Blackburn and Collins 2011), the biological significance of which was also recognized by the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2009. In addition to the retroviral and cellular RTs that maintain their respective genomes, RTs are also exploited by selfish DNA elements for their perpetuation. Genome-embedded retrotransposons encode RTs required for element mobility. In humans, non-LTR retrotransposon RTs copy polyadenosine-tailed templates to insert complementary DNA (cDNA) at nonspecific target sites, often with 5 ′ truncation (Finnegan 2012). In contrast, mobile group II introns encode RTs that copy the intron RNA to insert a precise full-length cDNA into an intronless allele of the host gene (Lambowitz and Zimmerly 2004). This process, termed retrohoming, must maintain the host gene exon sequences as precisely as the intron sequence to allow functional transcript production by intron splicing. Genome projects have unearthed hundreds of group II introns, mainly in prokaryotes and the organellar genomes of fungi and plants (Lambowitz and Zimmerly 2011).Group II intron RTs synthesize long cDNAs with high fidelity, but they have remained untapped as a source of RTs for biotechnology applications. Group II intron RTs associate tightly with their coevolved intron RNA templates, like non-LTR retroelement RTs and telomerase. This stymies the potential commercial applications of these RTs in copying heterologous RNA templates. Furthermore, due to a physiological dependence on protein and RNA cofolding, RTs other than retroviral family members have not been amenable to recomb...