“…An ideal hemostatic hydrogel for prehospital hemorrhage control in emergency situations should possess the following characteristics: − ,,, (i) rapid in situ gelation, strong wet adhesion, excellent mechanical strength, and suitable swelling properties to quickly stop bleeding and withstand biological pressures (e.g., blood pressure and tissue compression); (ii) efficient antibacterial and wound healing capabilities to inhibit wound infection and promote tissue regeneration; (iii) good biocompatibility and biodegradability with no inflammatory or toxic side-effects; (iv) being injectable to flexibly fill irregularly shaped wounds, ready to use (e.g., prepackaged in a syringe, with no requirement for mixing or further preparation), and simple to use by wounded soldiers and nontrained civilians. Although numerous strategies have been proposed to construct different hemostatic hydrogels, such as superwetting, biomimetics, ,− double-network, , chemical cross-linking, , photo-cross-linking, ,,,,,, oxidative cross-linking, − and thermoresponsive design, ,, the ideal hemostat that satisfies all the above requirements for emergency hemostasis is still lacking, and the intrinsic limitations of the current state-of-the-art hemostatic hydrogel systems need to be further addressed. For example, a recent work engineered a promising thermoresponsive hemostatic hydrogel composed of poly- N -isopropylacrylamide (PNIPAM) and silicate nanodisks, which could be used as a first aid hemostat to treat external hemorrhages in emergency situations just via simple injection; however, the antibacterial and wound healing capacities of the hemostat have not been investigated, which are all crucial properties for noncompressible hemorrhage control.…”