Thermoplastic starch based blends as a highly renewable filament for fused deposition modeling 3D printing

Ju, Qing; Tang, Z.; Shi, Huidong; Zhu, Yanfeng; Shen, Yucai; Wang, Tingwei

doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.232

Cited by 28 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Due to the demand for different applications, FDM researchers have developed several composite filaments. For instance, Sciancalepore et al proposed polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)-reinforced ZTC microparticles to develop an ecofriendly biocomposite as a filament for use in 3D printers, and Ju et al proposed a blend comprising thermoplastic starch (TPS), PLA, and PBAT as a highly renewable filament, which also had minimal brittleness . A PLA blend with poly(butylene succinate) exhibited improved tensile and impact strength .…”

Section: Fdm 3d Printersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, Sciancalepore et al proposed polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)-reinforced ZTC microparticles to develop an ecofriendly biocomposite as a filament for use in 3D printers, 20 and Ju et al proposed a blend comprising thermoplastic starch (TPS), PLA, and PBAT as a highly renewable filament, which also had minimal brittleness. 21 A PLA blend with poly(butylene succinate) exhibited improved tensile and impact strength. 22 Another blend comprising ABS with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) improved the scratch resistance of the printed parts and their mechanical strength.…”

Section: Fdm 3d Printersmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Strategies To Modify the Surface and Bulk Properties of 3D-Printed Solid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3D printing is one of the effective scaffold fabrication techniques that emerged in the 21st century that has the potential to revolutionize the field of tissue engineering. The solid scaffolds developed by 3D printing are still one of the most sought-after approaches for developing hard-tissue regeneration and repair. However, applications of these solid scaffolds get limited due to their poor surface and bulk properties, which play a significant role in tissue integration, loadbearing, antimicrobial/antifouling properties, and others. As a result, several efforts have been directed to modify the surface and bulk of these solid scaffolds. These modifications have significantly improved the adoption of 3D-printed solid scaffolds and devices in the healthcare industry. Nevertheless, the in vivo implant applications of these 3D-printed solid scaffolds/devices are still under development. They require attention in terms of their surface/bulk properties, which dictate their functionality. Therefore, in the current review, we have discussed different 3D-printing parameters that facilitate the fabrication of solid scaffolds/devices with different properties. Further, changes in the bulk properties through material and microstructure modification are also being discussed. After that, we deliberated on the techniques that modify the surfaces through chemical and material modifications. The computational approaches for the bulk modification of these 3D-printed materials are also mentioned, focusing on tissue engineering. We have also briefly discussed the application of these solid scaffolds/devices in tissue engineering. Eventually, the review is concluded with an analysis of the choice of surface/bulk modification based on the intended application in tissue engineering.

show abstract

Section: Fdm 3d Printersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Fdm 3d Printersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategies To Modify the Surface and Bulk Properties of 3D-Printed Solid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The disruption of starch granules is performed through gelatinization and the addition of water and glycerol as a plasticizer [ 32 ]. In addition, to obtain the required physical and mechanical properties, TPS is often blended with other polymers or additives [ 33 ]. Many different inclusions are used to reinforce the material and improve its gas barrier capacity, such as fibers [ 34 , 35 ] and clay fillers [ 36 ] or metal oxides [ 37 ].…”

Section: Bioplastics: Definitions and Classificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anaerobic Biodegradability of Commercial Bioplastic Products: Systematic Bibliographic Analysis and Critical Assessment of the Latest Advances

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bioplastics have entered everyday life as a potential sustainable substitute for commodity plastics. However, still further progress should be made to clarify their degradation behavior under controlled and uncontrolled conditions. The wide array of biopolymers and commercial blends available make predicting the biodegradation degree and kinetics quite a complex issue that requires specific knowledge of the multiple factors affecting the degradation process. This paper summarizes the main scientific literature on anaerobic digestion of biodegradable plastics through a general bibliographic analysis and a more detailed discussion of specific results from relevant experimental studies. The critical analysis of literature data initially included 275 scientific references, which were then screened for duplication/pertinence/relevance. The screened references were analyzed to derive some general features of the research profile, trends, and evolution in the field of anaerobic biodegradation of bioplastics. The second stage of the analysis involved extracting detailed results about bioplastic degradability under anaerobic conditions by screening analytical and performance data on biodegradation performance for different types of bioplastic products and different anaerobic biodegradation conditions, with a particular emphasis on the most recent data. A critical overview of existing biopolymers is presented, along with their properties and degradation mechanisms and the operating parameters influencing/enhancing the degradation process under anaerobic conditions.

show abstract

“…The low printing temperature made it possible to introduce some bioactive components to produce antibacterial and biocompatible materials for FDM. Ju et al [ 20 ] prepared a TPS/PLA/PBAT composite for FDM 3D printing, the filament had successful printability, and the samples could be printed accurately. Meanwhile, they found that the mechanical properties of the samples could be improved significantly when the chain extender ADR4468 was used.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

FDM 3D Printing and Soil-Burial-Degradation Behaviors of Residue of Astragalus Particles/Thermoplastic Starch/Poly(lactic acid) Biocomposites

Zhang¹,

Lei

et al. 2023

Polymers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Astragalus residue powder (ARP)/thermoplastic starch (TPS)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by fused-deposition modeling (FDM) 3D-printing technology for the first time in this paper, and certain physico-mechanical properties and soil-burial-biodegradation behaviors of the biocomposites were investigated. The results showed that after raising the dosage of ARP, the tensile and flexural strengths, the elongation at break and the thermal stability of the sample decreased, while the tensile and flexural moduli increased; after raising the dosage of TPS, the tensile and flexural strengths, the elongation at break and the thermal stability all decreased. Among all of the samples, sample C—which was composed of 11 wt.% ARP, 10 wt.% TPS and 79 wt.% PLA—was the cheapest and also the most easily degraded in water. The soil-degradation-behavior analysis of sample C showed that, after being buried in soil, the surfaces of the samples became grey at first, then darkened, after which the smooth surfaces became rough and certain components were found to detach from the samples. After soil burial for 180 days, there was weight loss of 21.40%, and the flexural strength and modulus, as well as the storage modulus, reduced from 82.1 MPa, 11,922.16 MPa and 2395.3 MPa to 47.6 MPa, 6653.92 MPa and 1476.5 MPa, respectively. Soil burial had little effect on the glass transition, cold crystallization or melting temperatures, while it reduced the crystallinity of the samples. It is concluded that the FDM 3D-printed ARP/TPS/PLA biocomposites are easy to degrade in soil conditions. This study developed a new kind of thoroughly degradable biocomposite for FDM 3D printing.

show abstract

Thermoplastic starch based blends as a highly renewable filament for fused deposition modeling 3D printing

Cited by 28 publications

References 43 publications

Strategies To Modify the Surface and Bulk Properties of 3D-Printed Solid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

Strategies To Modify the Surface and Bulk Properties of 3D-Printed Solid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

Anaerobic Biodegradability of Commercial Bioplastic Products: Systematic Bibliographic Analysis and Critical Assessment of the Latest Advances

FDM 3D Printing and Soil-Burial-Degradation Behaviors of Residue of Astragalus Particles/Thermoplastic Starch/Poly(lactic acid) Biocomposites

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About