2010
DOI: 10.4236/ns.2010.26077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermophysical properties of dunite rocks as a function of temperature along with the prediction of effective thermal conductivity

Abstract: The thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity and heat capacity per unit volume of dunite rocks taken from Chillas near Gilgit, Pakistan have been measured simultaneously using transient plane source technique. The temperature dependence of thermal transport properties is studied in the temperature range 83-303 K. Different relations for the estimation of thermal conductivity are also tested. Thermal conductivity data obey the modified Eucken’s law in the temperature range of measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the initial data points are neglected to eliminate the effect of contact resistance. As far as measurement errors of this technique are concerned, the standard deviations in the measurements of thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and specific heat capacity are 5%, 7%, and 10%, respectively [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the initial data points are neglected to eliminate the effect of contact resistance. As far as measurement errors of this technique are concerned, the standard deviations in the measurements of thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and specific heat capacity are 5%, 7%, and 10%, respectively [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a), Paleozoic and metamorphic rocks of the southern fore-Sudetic monocline (unit Cc), Permian rocks of the northern fore-Sudetic monocline (unit B4), Cenozoic, Triassic and Carboniferous rocks of the Upper Silesian block (unit Cb), Flysch complex in the Inner Carpathians (unit Dc), as well as chosen magmatic rocks of the crystalline basement. Figure 6 shows experimental thermal conductivity data λ for the area of Poland (green squares) compiled from Chmura (1970Chmura ( , 1987, Downorowicz (1983), Plewa (1988), Plewa and Plewa (1992) and shows for comparison abroad data (red circles) compiled from Moisiejev and Smyslov (1986), Eppelbaum et al (2014), Sharma (2002), Kappelmeyer and Hänel (1974), Dortman (1976), Zeb et al (2010), Blackwell and Steele (1989), Clark (1966). Values shown by grey horizontal bars were used for modeling in Model D. Grey dotted lines show a range of values, basically between about 1 and 4 W/m°C, slightly increasing with rock depth/age.…”
Section: Heat Flow and Thermal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Chmura (1970Chmura ( , 1987, Downorowicz (1983), Plewa (1988), Plewa and Plewa (1992), Bała and Waliczek (2012). Values shown by grey horizontal bars and corresponding values in the top of figure were used for modeling in Model D. For comparison red circles show abroad data compiled from Moisiejev and Smyslov (1986), Eppelbaum et al 2014, Sharma (2002), Kappelmeyer and Hänel (1974), Dortman (1976), Zeb et al (2010), Blackwell and Steele (1989), Clark (1966). Grey dotted lines show a range of values, basically between about 1 and 4 W/m°C, slightly increasing with rock depth…”
Section: Heat Flow and Thermal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%