2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermophysical and mechanical property assessment of UB2 and UB4 sintered via spark plasma sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[35] but a different code was used to obtain the results. The moduli obtained in this work agrees fairly well with the experimental measurement of Dancausse et al [13] but differs to Kardoulaki et al [55] where the authors suggest potential internal cracking in their sample. There is variation in the values of θ D due to the different methods and samples e.g.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[35] but a different code was used to obtain the results. The moduli obtained in this work agrees fairly well with the experimental measurement of Dancausse et al [13] but differs to Kardoulaki et al [55] where the authors suggest potential internal cracking in their sample. There is variation in the values of θ D due to the different methods and samples e.g.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…In both calculated heat ca-215 pacities the electronic contribution, γT (where γ = 9.40 mJ / K 2 • mol [58]) is included. It can be seen that the calculation reproduces the experimental result well, particularly at low temperatures, and therefore the large discrepancy between the calculated and experimental κ l [55] is likely due to either ν or τ. The discrepancy between the results obtained through DFT and Phono3py calculations and the available experimental data [55] could be due to an overestimated calculated phonon relaxation time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations