2004
DOI: 10.1080/02786820490251358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermophoretic Deposition of Particles in Laminar and Turbulent Tube Flows

Abstract: Thermophoretic deposition of aerosol particles (particle diameter ranges from 0.038 to 0.498 µm) was measured in a tube (1.18 m long, 0.43 cm inner diameter, stainless steel tube) using monodisperse NaCl test particles under laminar and turbulent flow conditions. In the previous study by Romay et al., theoretical thermophoretic deposition efficiencies in turbulent flow regime do not agree well with the experimental data. In this study, particle deposition efficiencies due to other deposition mechanisms such as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermophoresis will act to focus the particles in the heated section, but de-focus the particle stream as it enters the cooler denuding section. These increased losses at higher temperatures are expected and are within the range of characterizations carried out in previous studies of heated tubes using both theoretical (Housiadas and Drossinos 2005;Stratmann and Fissan 1988) and experimental (Burtscher et al 2001;Tsai et al 2004;Walsh et al 2006) techniques. While diffusion increases greatly as particle size decreases, thermophoretic forces are not strongly sizedependent (Burtscher et al 2001;Hinds, 1999b), but can move particles closer to the walls where diffusion of small particles can be more efficient.…”
Section: Particle Number and Mass Loss Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Thermophoresis will act to focus the particles in the heated section, but de-focus the particle stream as it enters the cooler denuding section. These increased losses at higher temperatures are expected and are within the range of characterizations carried out in previous studies of heated tubes using both theoretical (Housiadas and Drossinos 2005;Stratmann and Fissan 1988) and experimental (Burtscher et al 2001;Tsai et al 2004;Walsh et al 2006) techniques. While diffusion increases greatly as particle size decreases, thermophoretic forces are not strongly sizedependent (Burtscher et al 2001;Hinds, 1999b), but can move particles closer to the walls where diffusion of small particles can be more efficient.…”
Section: Particle Number and Mass Loss Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The importance of this deposition mechanism has been exhaustively studied theoretically with models [25], experimentally with latex particles [26], and specifically with soot particles [27]. The authors of these studies have indicated the importance of thermophoresis for small particles.…”
Section: Mean Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this phenomenon has been extensively studied both theoretically and experimentally (e.g., Brock 1962;Montassier et al 1991;Stratmann et al 1994;Brown et al 1994;Romay et al 1998;Tsai et al 2004). Thermophoresis has been exploited in the design of thermophoretic precipitators to deposit particles from gas streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%