2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0892-6875(02)00092-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermophilic heap leaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate

Abstract: Thermophiles have been shown to be the only micro-organisms to leach chalcopyrite successfully. Heap leaching may be a feasible alternative to conventional bio-reactors, providing a high temperature environment can be maintained within the heap without external heating.In the present study thermophilic heap leaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate coated onto inert support rocks (the GEOCOATe process) was studied in sets of small heated columns. The temperature was gradually increased to 70°C, while successively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat and moisture can be conserved in the heap by manipulating the rates of solution irrigation onto the heap and air up flow in the heap (Kelly et al, 2008;Harvey et al, 2002;Dixon, 2000), and through the appropriate use of transparent plastic sheets. This method therefore allows the leaching of ore or concentrate using the low capital and operating costs of heap leaching but with the advantage of operating at a higher temperature for faster reaction kinetics (Petersen and Dixon, 2002). Additionally, this stage is required to reduce the consumption of cyanide by the copper and nickel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat and moisture can be conserved in the heap by manipulating the rates of solution irrigation onto the heap and air up flow in the heap (Kelly et al, 2008;Harvey et al, 2002;Dixon, 2000), and through the appropriate use of transparent plastic sheets. This method therefore allows the leaching of ore or concentrate using the low capital and operating costs of heap leaching but with the advantage of operating at a higher temperature for faster reaction kinetics (Petersen and Dixon, 2002). Additionally, this stage is required to reduce the consumption of cyanide by the copper and nickel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen is often a limiting reagent in heap bioleaching processes of sulphide minerals and therefore aeration helps to increase leaching rates. It also could be a way to control the temperature in the heap as the leaching reactions are mostly exothermic (Petersen and Dixon, 2002b;Dixon, 2000).…”
Section: Po2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a , 2005). This finding is, of course, dependent on whether excessive heat is generated in a heap or whether heat retention is the key for maintaining desired high temperature conditions for chalcopyrite leaching, as indicated by the column tests by Petersen and Dixon (2002b). HotHeap™ is a biological heap leach operating philosophy coupled with an instrumentation and control system that maximizes heat conservation and thus bioleaching kinetics.…”
Section: Heat Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetic data showed a good fit (Fig. 11) to the diffusion controlled model according to Equation (3) The dissolution of copper proceeded by the diffusion of Fe (III) as the lixiviant generated bio-genically, through the porous product layer possibly of the jarosite formed on the ore particles [10][11][12][13]. The rate constant values for the diffusion controlled bioleaching of copper with hyperthermophiles were obtained from Figure 11 as 0.0052, diffusion controlled model [5].…”
Section: Kinetics Of Chalcopyrite Bioleaching By Sulfolobusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that one of the problems that has had to be overcome in the leaching of chalcopyrite was that, when using natural bacteria, a passivating layer Article published by EDP Sciences forms on the mineral surfaces that prevents further leaching [10][11][12][13]. This passivating layer could come from one or both of two sources: Fe(OH) 3 tends to form jarosite (KFe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 ), which coats the unreacted material and forms a passivating layer and/or, the elemental sulfur formed in reaction (1), which also tends to coat the surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%