Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06943-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermophiles and carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) in biofilm microbial consortia that decompose lignocellulosic plant litters at high temperatures

Abstract: The SKY hot spring is a unique site filled with a thick layer of plant litter. With the advancement of next-generation sequencing, it is now possible to mine many new biocatalyst sequences. In this study, we aimed to (i) identify the metataxonomic of prokaryotes and eukaryotes in microbial mats using 16S and 18S rRNA markers, (ii) and explore carbohydrate degrading enzymes (CAZymes) that have a high potential for future applications. Green microbial mat, predominantly photosynthetic bacteria, was attached to s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a limitation, given that AMPs are known to target bacterial components such as surface lipids (AMP-lipid interactions are involved in membrane disruption) and polysaccharides, that are also known to play a role in biofilm formation ( Hollmann et al., 2018 ; Benfield and Henriques, 2020 ; Lin et al., 2020 ; Zhang et al., 2021 ). Future expansions of B-AMP v2.0 can include bacterial lipid and lipoprotein targets from databases such as LIPID MAPS Consortium and DOLOP, and bacterial carbohydrates using Polysac DB, Bacterial CSDB, and CAZy ( ) ( LIPID MAPS ® lipidomics gateway ; Babu et al., 2006 ; Onyango et al., 2021 ; Leggieri et al., 2022 ; Liew et al., 2022 ). An additional limitation in B-AMP v2.0 is that the targets represent only bacterial targets (no fungal targets), and 3D structural models are not available for all biofilm targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a limitation, given that AMPs are known to target bacterial components such as surface lipids (AMP-lipid interactions are involved in membrane disruption) and polysaccharides, that are also known to play a role in biofilm formation ( Hollmann et al., 2018 ; Benfield and Henriques, 2020 ; Lin et al., 2020 ; Zhang et al., 2021 ). Future expansions of B-AMP v2.0 can include bacterial lipid and lipoprotein targets from databases such as LIPID MAPS Consortium and DOLOP, and bacterial carbohydrates using Polysac DB, Bacterial CSDB, and CAZy ( ) ( LIPID MAPS ® lipidomics gateway ; Babu et al., 2006 ; Onyango et al., 2021 ; Leggieri et al., 2022 ; Liew et al., 2022 ). An additional limitation in B-AMP v2.0 is that the targets represent only bacterial targets (no fungal targets), and 3D structural models are not available for all biofilm targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a limitation, given that AMPs are known to target bacterial components such as surface lipids (AMP-lipid interactions are involved in membrane disruption) and polysaccharides, that are also known to play a role in biofilm formation (Hollmann et al, 2018; Benfield and Henriques, 2020; Lin et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2021). Future expansions of B-AMP v2.0 can include bacterial lipid and lipoprotein targets from databases such as LIPID MAPS Consortium and DOLOP, and bacterial carbohydrates using Polysac DB, Bacterial CSDB, and CAZy (www.cazy.org/) (LIPID MAPS® Lipidomics Gateway; Babu et al, 2006; Onyango et al, 2021; Leggieri et al, 2022; Liew et al, 2022). An additional limitation in B-AMP v2.0 is that the targets represent only bacterial targets (no fungal targets), and 3D structural models are not available for all biofilm targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UpSet analysis (threshold > 0.1) was used to show each sample’s shared and unique microorganism. Unigenes were compared with the KEGG [ 51 ] and CAZymes databases [ 52 , 53 ] (blastp, evalue ≤ 1 × 10 −5 ) to obtain the annotation enrichment of each database. The statistical analysis was carried out by pairwise comparisons with Welch’s t -test [ 54 ] at KEGG levels 1 and 2, and CAZy level 2, with p < 0.05 as a significant difference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%