2000
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/9/5/308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermomechanical characterization of NiTiCu and NiTi SMA actuators: influence of plastic strains

Abstract: The focus of this study is the thermomechanical characterization and comparison between two different shape memory alloys (SMAs) quantifying the effect of plastic strain on the transformation characteristics of SMA actuators. In this study, the thermomechanical response and transformation characteristics of a NiTiCu and a NiTi SMA are studied as a function of the induced plastic strain for four different loading paths: 1) an elastic-plastic loading of the austenitic phase, 2) a stress-induced martensitic phase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
51
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and also shown experimentally in Fig. 4 [13]. Such a path is similar to the one previously described, though in this particular case a constant stress is maintained throughout the thermal cycle.…”
Section: The Shape Memory Effectsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…2 and also shown experimentally in Fig. 4 [13]. Such a path is similar to the one previously described, though in this particular case a constant stress is maintained throughout the thermal cycle.…”
Section: The Shape Memory Effectsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The characteristic transformation temperatures for the austenite-to-martensite phase transformation as well as the mechanical response can be modified to meet application requirements through (i) thermo-mechanical processing, [19][20][21] (ii) slight variation from the equi-atomic NiTi chemical composition, [22,23] or (iii) addition of alloying elements. [24][25][26][27][28] This phase transformation generally involves an austenitic cubic B2 structure transforming to and from either a martensitic monoclinic B19 or orthorhombic B19¢ structure. Depending on the thermo-mechanical processing, intermediate phase transformations may occur as well; one of the particular notes is the commonly observed R-phase transformation, which involves a slight distortion of the austenitic cubic B2 structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling of plasticity and transformation in SMAs produces irrecoverable strain and reduces the work output under cyclic loading. The poor stability of SMAs under thermal cyclic loading is experimentally illustrated in [1,2], and the instability during superelasticity is reported in [3,4]. Furthermore, the creep mechanism is usually activated in HTSMAs because the martensitic transformation temperatures lie between 0.3 and 0.5 of HTSMA melting temperatures where visco-plastic behavior in metallic alloys occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%