2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-019-04324-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermomechanical Behavior of Biocompatible Austenitic Stainless Steels during Simulated Torsion Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another reason for this discrepancy is the moderate stacking fault energy, γ sfe = 69 mJ/m 2 . Aquino et al [41] stated that the stacking fault energy of this steel is well above that of other austenitic steels, such as AISI 304/304L (γ sfe = 18 mJ/m 2 ) [42] and that this energy hinders the evolution of SRX/MDRX by favoring the action of thermally activated mechanisms and hence the SRV mechanism. The same finding was reported by Gerônimo et al [43], who studied AISI 316LVM steel, γ sfe = 78 mJ/m 2 [44].…”
Section: Microstructural Featuresmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Another reason for this discrepancy is the moderate stacking fault energy, γ sfe = 69 mJ/m 2 . Aquino et al [41] stated that the stacking fault energy of this steel is well above that of other austenitic steels, such as AISI 304/304L (γ sfe = 18 mJ/m 2 ) [42] and that this energy hinders the evolution of SRX/MDRX by favoring the action of thermally activated mechanisms and hence the SRV mechanism. The same finding was reported by Gerônimo et al [43], who studied AISI 316LVM steel, γ sfe = 78 mJ/m 2 [44].…”
Section: Microstructural Featuresmentioning
confidence: 90%