Abstract:The shape of composite peak 5 in the glow curve of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) following 90 Sr/ 90 Y beta irradiation, previously demonstrated to be dependent on the cooling rate used in the 4008 8 8 8 8C pre-irradiation anneal, is shown to be dependent on ionisation density in both naturally cooled and slow-cooled samples. Following heavy-charged particle high-ionisation density (HID) irradiation, the temperature of composite peak 5 decreases by ∼58 8 8 8 8C and the peak becomes broader. This behaviour is attributed… Show more
“…First, it can be compared with Monte Carlo simulations done for the purposes of nanodosimetry [26]. Second, it will be possible to compare this dependence (correspondingly modified) with dosimetric experiments [27,28]. At this point, it is possible to use the dependence shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Damage Complexity Distribution From the Random Walk Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 is shorter than 10 nm. Even though, this size is about 1000 times smaller (for glial cells) than that of the cell's nucleus [7]; it plays a significant role in calculations of the probability of cell death and will be critical for the comparisons with nano-dosimetric data [26][27][28]31].…”
Section: Dose Gymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we can integrate the radial-dependent probability of the complex damage given by Eq. (1) (for appropriate N (ρ) dependence) with this density distribution: This gives the number of clusters of ν lesions per nm, which can be compared with the nano-dosimetric experiments [26][27][28]31] and can give still another relation for unknown parameters such as Γ and the dependence of lethality of damage on the order of cluster ν.…”
This paper is devoted to the analysis of the complex damage of DNA irradiated by ions. The assessment of complex damage is important because cells in which it occurs are less likely to survive because the DNA repair mechanisms may not be sufficiently effective. We study the flux of secondary electrons through the surface of nucleosomes and calculate the radial dose and the distribution of clustered damage around the ion's path. The calculated radial dose distribution is compared to simulations. The radial distribution of the complex damage is found to be different from that of the dose. A comparison with experiments may solve the question of what is more lethal for the cell, damage complexity or absorbed energy. We suggest a way to calculate the probability of cell death based on the complexity of the damage. This work is done within the framework of the phenomenon-based multiscale approach to radiation damage by ions.
“…First, it can be compared with Monte Carlo simulations done for the purposes of nanodosimetry [26]. Second, it will be possible to compare this dependence (correspondingly modified) with dosimetric experiments [27,28]. At this point, it is possible to use the dependence shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Damage Complexity Distribution From the Random Walk Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 is shorter than 10 nm. Even though, this size is about 1000 times smaller (for glial cells) than that of the cell's nucleus [7]; it plays a significant role in calculations of the probability of cell death and will be critical for the comparisons with nano-dosimetric data [26][27][28]31].…”
Section: Dose Gymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we can integrate the radial-dependent probability of the complex damage given by Eq. (1) (for appropriate N (ρ) dependence) with this density distribution: This gives the number of clusters of ν lesions per nm, which can be compared with the nano-dosimetric experiments [26][27][28]31] and can give still another relation for unknown parameters such as Γ and the dependence of lethality of damage on the order of cluster ν.…”
This paper is devoted to the analysis of the complex damage of DNA irradiated by ions. The assessment of complex damage is important because cells in which it occurs are less likely to survive because the DNA repair mechanisms may not be sufficiently effective. We study the flux of secondary electrons through the surface of nucleosomes and calculate the radial dose and the distribution of clustered damage around the ion's path. The calculated radial dose distribution is compared to simulations. The radial distribution of the complex damage is found to be different from that of the dose. A comparison with experiments may solve the question of what is more lethal for the cell, damage complexity or absorbed energy. We suggest a way to calculate the probability of cell death based on the complexity of the damage. This work is done within the framework of the phenomenon-based multiscale approach to radiation damage by ions.
“…One of the approaches is to measure number of ionizations caused by radiation in gaseous targets of millimetric dimensions and recalculate the result to the biological nanometric sites using scaling procedure [1]. Another approach is to study thermoluminescent recombination between charge carriers trapped in centers of ~2 nm dimensions under influence of ionizing radiation [2].…”
Abstract-Lead sulfide (PbS) nanoparticles embedded in a thin-film matrix of zirconium oxide (ZrO 2 ), ZrO 2 :PbS nanofilms, were studied for application in nanodosimetry of ionizing radiation. Readout of the delivered dose was carried out by measurements of photoelectron emission (PE) current from ZrO 2 :PbS nanofilms. PE emission was excited by UV photons having energy of 4.6-6.2 eV. First, the nanofilms were irradiated with non-ionizing UV radiation used as a model of ionizing radiation in order to extract exposure-dependent signal from PE spectra of ZrO 2 :PbS nanofilms. It was found that exposure-dependent signal is provided by PbS nanoparticles and it is the decrease of the increment of PE current calculated in energy range of 4.9-5.5 eV. The extracted signal was further analyzed by irradiating ZrO 2 :PbS nanofilms with 9 MeV electron radiation. Second degree polynomial relationship was observed between the decrease of the increment of PE spectra calculated in the energy range of 4.9-5.5 eV and dose of electron radiation in the range of 0-10 Gy. Error of dose measurement was calculated for each delivered dose. Error of dose measurement decreases from 65% to 11% when the delivered dose increases from 2 Gy to 5 Gy and doesn't exceed 11% in the dose range of 5-10 Gy. Changes in PE spectra of ZrO 2 :PbS nanofilms under influence of electron radiation suggest that the nanofilms have potential to be used in nanodosimetry of ionizing radiation; however, further adjustment of the method is required to reduce dose measurement error.
“…Peak 5a, a low-temperature component of composite peak 5, is believed to arise from joint e -h capture in the TC/LC molecular complex and this 'two-energy-transfer' event is preferred at HID compared with the 'single-energy transfer' event giving rise to peak 5 (electron capture only) (3) . It has been suggested that the ratio 5a/5 can provide a nanodosimetric measurement of average ionisation density in the 'nanoscopic' volume comprising the TC/LC molecular complex giving rise to peaks 5a and 5 (4) ; (3) the decrease in the relative efficiency following HID/HCP irradiation, which has been modelled by track structure theory (TST) with some degree of success (5) . However, the TST premise that the radiation action of HCPs is exclusively due to the dose delivered by the secondary electrons liberated by the HCP slowing down has never been subjected to a stringent test.…”
Three outstanding effects of ionisation density on the thermoluminescence (TL) mechanisms giving rise to the glow peaks of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) are currently under investigation: (1) the dependence of the heavy charged particle (HCP) relative efficiency with increasing ionisation density and the effectiveness of its modelling by track structure theory (TST), (2) the behaviour of the TL efficiency, f(D), as a function of photon energy and dose. These studies are intended to promote the development of a firm theoretical basis for the evaluation of relative TL efficiencies to assist in their application in mixed radiation fields. And (3) the shape of composite peak 5 in the glow curve for various HCP types and energies and following high-dose electron irradiation, i.e. the ratio of the intensity of peak 5a to peak 5. Peak 5a is a low-temperature satellite of peak 5 arising from electron-hole capture in a spatially correlated trapping centre/luminescent centre (TC/LC) complex that has been suggested to possess a potential as a solid-state nanodosemeter due to the preferential electron/hole population of the TC/LC at high ionisation density. It is concluded that (1) the predictions of TST are very strongly dependent on the choice of photon energy used in the determination of f(D); (2) modified TST employing calculated values of f(D) at 2 keV is in agreement with 5-MeV alpha particle experimental results for composite peak 5 but underestimates the 1.5-MeV proton relative efficiencies. Both the proton and alpha particle relative TL efficiencies of the high-temperature TL (HTTL) peaks 7 and 8 are underestimated by an order of magnitude suggesting that the HTTL efficiencies are affected by other factors in addition to radial electron dose; (3) the dose-response supralinearity of peaks 7 and 8 change rapidly with photon energy: this behaviour is explained in the framework of the unified interaction model as due to a very strong dependence on photon energy of the relative intensity of localised recombination and (4) the increased width and decrease in T(max) of composite peak 5 as a function of ionisation density is due to the greater relative intensity of peak 5a (a low-temperature component of peak 5 arising from two-energy transfer events, which leads to localised recombination).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.