1975
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210290102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoluminescence and lattice defects in LiF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can explain the saturation of the traps and the daniage which can be removed only by high-teniperature (400 "C) anneal. The existence of the non-luminescent centres has been known since long [14]. The defects which can play this role (presumably related with the OH impurity) have been suggested.…”
Section: Physical Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can explain the saturation of the traps and the daniage which can be removed only by high-teniperature (400 "C) anneal. The existence of the non-luminescent centres has been known since long [14]. The defects which can play this role (presumably related with the OH impurity) have been suggested.…”
Section: Physical Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In attempting to solve the problem, a quite significant attention was drawn to the development and study of LiF doped with B, Si, Mg, Cu, Ti and other dopants including lanthanides (see [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and reference therein). Nowadays, commercial TLDs based on LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100/600/700) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H/600H/700H) and their modifications are well accepted in the industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier paper [l] we have reported that the y-radiation induced sensitization of peak 5 remains unaltered even after complete bleaching of the residual thermoluminescence (RTL) of peak 10 (at 415 "C) by means of intense UV (253.7 nm) illumination at 300 "C for 1 h. However, the sensitization factor of peak 7 reduces from a value of 40 to 1. 3 for the same treatment. The sensitization of peak 5 was attributed to the removal (due to filling) of competing non-luminescent centres to the luminescent centres during pre-irradiation and post-annealing treatment, on lines similar to that proposed earlier by Zimmerman [2] and Stoebe and Watanabe [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 for the same treatment. The sensitization of peak 5 was attributed to the removal (due to filling) of competing non-luminescent centres to the luminescent centres during pre-irradiation and post-annealing treatment, on lines similar to that proposed earlier by Zimmerman [2] and Stoebe and Watanabe [3]. Mayhugh [4] and Charles and Khan [5] have reported that a similar UV/thermal anneal at 300 "C for 1 h results in a drastic reduction in peak 10 intensity (by a factor of about 100) and also in Z3-band intensity, the fall in sensitization of peak 5 being only slight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%