“…The present analysis has been performed under the assumption that the parallel-cooled FW shares the same hydraulic design of the series-cooled FW; indeed, the th ermalhydraulics of a parallel FW was not designed yet, and hence it should be possible to further reduce the maximum temperature in the FW without increasing the mass flow rate: in this case, in fact, the FW would become a totally independent component, which could be redesigned in order to withstand such higher heat fluxes (we have not considered the adoption of suitable heat transfer promoters, already under investigation [21], or of the "half-monoblock FW" design proposed by the HCPB design team [22]). Note that the use of heat transfer promoters, such as those analyzed in [21], in the "series" cooling option could actually yield the same result of the parallel option: this would still lead to an increased pressure drop (up to 2.8× [21]), but without increasing the mass flow rate, limiting the increase in the compression power. Eventually, the different solutions could also be mixed, combining half-monoblock FW, heat transfer promoters and parallel FW [22].…”