2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermohydraulics of rib-roughened helium gas running cooling channels for first wall applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present analysis has been performed under the assumption that the parallel-cooled FW shares the same hydraulic design of the series-cooled FW; indeed, the th ermalhydraulics of a parallel FW was not designed yet, and hence it should be possible to further reduce the maximum temperature in the FW without increasing the mass flow rate: in this case, in fact, the FW would become a totally independent component, which could be redesigned in order to withstand such higher heat fluxes (we have not considered the adoption of suitable heat transfer promoters, already under investigation [21], or of the "half-monoblock FW" design proposed by the HCPB design team [22]). Note that the use of heat transfer promoters, such as those analyzed in [21], in the "series" cooling option could actually yield the same result of the parallel option: this would still lead to an increased pressure drop (up to 2.8× [21]), but without increasing the mass flow rate, limiting the increase in the compression power. Eventually, the different solutions could also be mixed, combining half-monoblock FW, heat transfer promoters and parallel FW [22].…”
Section: Results Of Getthem Whole Segment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present analysis has been performed under the assumption that the parallel-cooled FW shares the same hydraulic design of the series-cooled FW; indeed, the th ermalhydraulics of a parallel FW was not designed yet, and hence it should be possible to further reduce the maximum temperature in the FW without increasing the mass flow rate: in this case, in fact, the FW would become a totally independent component, which could be redesigned in order to withstand such higher heat fluxes (we have not considered the adoption of suitable heat transfer promoters, already under investigation [21], or of the "half-monoblock FW" design proposed by the HCPB design team [22]). Note that the use of heat transfer promoters, such as those analyzed in [21], in the "series" cooling option could actually yield the same result of the parallel option: this would still lead to an increased pressure drop (up to 2.8× [21]), but without increasing the mass flow rate, limiting the increase in the compression power. Eventually, the different solutions could also be mixed, combining half-monoblock FW, heat transfer promoters and parallel FW [22].…”
Section: Results Of Getthem Whole Segment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited capability is caused by the relatively low thermal conductivity of the heat sink material Eurofer. Analyses so far show that this limit can be respected during normal operation [2][3]. However, in case of normal and off normal transients the heat flux on the FW can exceed well the above-mentioned limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Ribbed surfaces and other turbulence or secondary flow inducing channel inserts can increase the heat transfer coefficient by factor 3-4. Alternatives are tested by experiments and by high fidelity fluid dynamics simulations, like the detached eddy (DES) technique [41]. Available fabrication techniques, in line with the general fabrication steps of the FW are a key issue for this work.…”
Section: Blanket Fw and Limitersmentioning
confidence: 99%