Our evaluation of the performance of various flameretardant fabrics against molten metal splashes indicated the superior metal shedding properties of wool [4][5][6]. Recently, we noticed that some chrome dyed wool fabrics performed in an uncharacteristic manner against molten aluminium. This work evaluates the effect of chrome dyeing on the performance of wool against this molten metal.
-EXPERIMENTALWe used a 100% wool undyed gaberdine fabric, 270 g/m2 weight, 0.90 mm thickness, and 0.30 g/CM2 density. The fabric was treated at the boil in the laboratory dyemaster with 4% owf Eriochrome Black PV 200%, 4% owf ammonium sulphate, and acetic acid to give a bath pH of 4-4.5, at a liquor ratio of 30:1 until the dye had exhausted. Afterchroming was accomplished by changing the bath and adding ( 1.5%-6% potassium dichromate owf) and formic acid to give a bath pH of 3.5 and boiling for 30 minutes followed by one cold water rinse and oven drying at 100°C for 15 minutes.
TEST METHODSThe molten aluminium test was performed accord--ing to a test method decribed previously [5]; 150 g of molten aluminium at 800°C was poured on the fabric and the amount of metal that adhered to the fabric and damage to the PVC skin simulant was determined.Ash and Cr203 content were determined according to the IWTO 1976 (E), Appendix D test method. The chromium trioxide content of wool was determined from the result of the ash content of chrome dyed wool, less the ash content of undyed wool.Afterglowing time was evaluated according to the FAR 25.853b vertical flame test [I]. The afterglowing time was measured after the removal of the ignition source.
RESULTSApplication of more than 2.5% potassium dichromate in a complete chrome dyeing procedure resulted in adherence of molten aluminium to the wool fabric with subsequent heat transfer to the simulated PVC skin (Table I). When potassium dichromate was applied to the undyed fabric, a slightly higher concentration, more than 3%, was required to cause the same adverse effect. Treatment of wool with dichromate also significantly increased afterglowing time, particularly when more than 2.5% K2Cr207 was applied to dyed wool.
DISCUSSIONThermogravimetric analysis of dichromate treated wool has shown that its rate of decomposition is much faster than for untreated wool and this rate accelerates with increasing concentrations of dichromate [2]. It is possible that the observed adherence of molten aluminium to wool dyed with excessive dichromate concentrations could be explained in a similar manner as