2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2016.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermographic studies of outer target heat fluxes on KSTAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This becomes clear by comparing toroidally-averaged heat flux illustrated in figure 13(c). Here, the peak heat flux increases three times, showing good agreement with measured values using IR thermography [78]. Such an increase in divertor heat flux by RMPs is one of the distinguishing features in KSTAR [79] in that it is not common in other devices.…”
Section: Divertor Heat Fluxsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This becomes clear by comparing toroidally-averaged heat flux illustrated in figure 13(c). Here, the peak heat flux increases three times, showing good agreement with measured values using IR thermography [78]. Such an increase in divertor heat flux by RMPs is one of the distinguishing features in KSTAR [79] in that it is not common in other devices.…”
Section: Divertor Heat Fluxsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The width of B2.5 meshes is 15 mm at the outer midplane, which is wide enough to cover the heat decay length 4-5 mm obtained from simulations. This decay length is comparable to the value typically measured in KSTAR experiments (references [32,33]). We used the same mesh width for SAS and the original open divertors.…”
Section: Settings Of Simulationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Generally volumetric loss processes which are important in reducing the heat flux to the target (i.e., via detachment), are directly affected by the divertor structure and wall materials as shown in the case of SAS in DIII-D. In this paper, through numerical simulations using the SOLPS-ITER package [27][28][29][30][31] (but without particle drifts), we examined SASlike divertors in the KSTAR tokamak geometry to identify the factors that dominate the volumetric heat loss near the target (see reference [32,33] for general characteristics of KSTAR). Due to the limited space around the divertor in KSTAR, the depth of the slot used in our study is much smaller than the original SAS in DIII-D (hence, named SAS-like).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In KSTAR, 3-row and 4 column in-vessel control coils (IVCCs) are used to apply n = 1 or n = 2 magnetic perturbations with various toroidal phasing and different configurations. Recently improved degree of control of the RMPs coils made possible investigating the dynamics of the divertor heat flux with changing toroidal phase of the RMPs during a single plasma discharge while continuously maintaining the ELM suppression [10]. It was found that distribution of the divertor heat flux becomes three-dimensional with striation patterns closely resembling results of the field line tracing calculation, especially when including plasma response [11].…”
Section: Implications Of Applied 3d Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%