2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermographic 2D U-value map for quantifying thermal bridges in building façades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of linear thermal transmittance Ψ and point thermal transmittance χ depend on the configuration and thermal conductivity of material layers and on how the calculations of one-dimensional thermal transmittance were made, i.e., which values of coefficients U were selected for different building elements and which planes they correspond to. In most cases, heat loss calculations can be performed using the 2D model [45]. Heat losses can be expressed by the linear heat flux Q, [W/m].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of linear thermal transmittance Ψ and point thermal transmittance χ depend on the configuration and thermal conductivity of material layers and on how the calculations of one-dimensional thermal transmittance were made, i.e., which values of coefficients U were selected for different building elements and which planes they correspond to. In most cases, heat loss calculations can be performed using the 2D model [45]. Heat losses can be expressed by the linear heat flux Q, [W/m].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they stated that a stochastic analysis could help to reduce the sampling period and only 30 min could be enough for homogeneous specimens. Recently, the authors developed a 2D U-value map to automatically evaluate entire walls pixel-by-pixel under the impact of anomalies using quantitative IRT [34]. The results were checked by HFM method.…”
Section: Quantitative Infrared Thermography Under Steady-state Conditmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first NDT technique was carried out according to the procedure extensively reported by Tejedor et al [20], which considers a 1D horizontal heat flux generated by convection and radiation processes under stationary regime. For the real built environment, the recommendations of Tejedor et al [33] and Tejedor et al [34] should be taken into account in terms of operating conditions, thermo-physical properties and test duration. For example, 30 min can be enough for homogeneous samples, while 2-3 h are needed for heterogeneous samples.…”
Section: Laboratory Testing Under Steady-state Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yi [48] proposed an indoor and outdoor coupling simulation evaluation framework for microclimate change to demonstrate the influence of outdoor microclimate on the indoor thermal performance of the buildings. Tejedor [49] proposes the implementation of a 2D U-value map to quantify the influence of thermal bridges on building facades by internal quantitative infrared thermography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%