2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ThermoEPred-EL: Robust bandgap predictions of chalcogenides with diamond-like structure via feature cross-based stacked ensemble learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chalcogenides, especially the binary ones with ZnS-type structure, are promising candidates. Transition metals (most common components in binary ZnS-type chalcogenides) are prone to statistical mixing, which allows for a precise control of the band structure in these materials [163]. Ternary chalcogenides were predicted to be promising p-type transparent conductors [162].…”
Section: Property Prediction Using Machine Learning For Transition Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chalcogenides, especially the binary ones with ZnS-type structure, are promising candidates. Transition metals (most common components in binary ZnS-type chalcogenides) are prone to statistical mixing, which allows for a precise control of the band structure in these materials [163]. Ternary chalcogenides were predicted to be promising p-type transparent conductors [162].…”
Section: Property Prediction Using Machine Learning For Transition Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models trained on high-fidelity bandgap datasets are more useful. ML algorithms such as least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector regression, gradient boosting decision tree, artificial neural network, deep neural network, and k-nearest neighbor with handcrafted features have been used to establish relationships between composition/structure and high-fidelity bandgap [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. A chemical formula occasionally corresponds to several structures; therefore, models based on the structural features are more practical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both of them are computationally expensive and, thus, are restricted to small systems. As an alternative, the machine learning (ML) method has recently attracted considerable attention for band-gap prediction, which can efficiently manage a huge search space at an extremely low cost [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. For example, by choosing 28 primary atomic properties as input features, Pilania et al [30] obtained a kernel ridge regression (KRR) model to predict the band gaps of 1378 unique double perovskites, where the Pearson correlation coefficient can be as high as 97%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On top of the 136 compositional properties of inorganic solids, Zhuo et al [31] proposed a support vector regression (SVR) model for gap prediction and found a small root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.45 eV. In addition, by leveraging 42 initial elemental features of chalcogenides, Wang et al [33] developed a stacked ensemble learning (SEL)-gap model with a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) value of 90%. It should be noted that the above-mentioned ML models usually contain a large number of input features, which is actually not beneficial for the high-throughput discovery of desired systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%