2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.085121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelectric properties of the semimetallic Heusler compoundsFe2xV1+xM<

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
93
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
93
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A thermal hysteresis with ∆T 3K had already been reported in the iso-structural compound Lu 5 Rh 4 Si 10 at the vicinity of the CDW transition [7]. Usually, a first order transition is attributed to a lock-in transition with the lattice of a pre-existing incommensurate CDW at larger temperature, potentially above the room temperature [8].…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thermal hysteresis with ∆T 3K had already been reported in the iso-structural compound Lu 5 Rh 4 Si 10 at the vicinity of the CDW transition [7]. Usually, a first order transition is attributed to a lock-in transition with the lattice of a pre-existing incommensurate CDW at larger temperature, potentially above the room temperature [8].…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fe/V off-stoichiometric Fe 2-x V 1+x Al [17][18][19][20][21] , however, the dependence of thermoelectric power S on excess V content x cannot even be qualitatively explained in terms of the rigid-band model, as shown by the open circles in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[13,14] VFe 2 Al displays a large Seebeck coefficient (|S| > 150 µV/K) upon varying the VEC slightly from 24, achieved by introducing Ge [15] or Si [16] to the Al site, varying the V-Al ratio, [17,18,19] and varying the Fe-V ratio. [20,21] In contrast to VFe 2 Al, TiFe 2 Sn is a less explored compound, and the existing literature on TiFe 2 Sn has not indicated significant improvements in Seebeck coefficient upon varying the Ti:Fe ratio. [22,23] This discrepancy between calculations and experimental results is likely the result of anti-site Ti/Fe disorder, as has been suggested by lab X-ray diffraction and Mössbauer studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%