1985
DOI: 10.1021/j100254a044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelectric power of the high ionic conductivity glasses silver iodide:silver oxide.boron oxide

Abstract: We have shown that H02 forms transient complexes with the peroxovanadium(V) species but not with V02+. This is in agreement with the results of Samuni5 who detected ESR-active transients only in V(V) solutions containing peroxide. The presence of a faster decaying complex, which we have designated V05"O2H, was not detected by Samuni and Czapski6 in a perchloric acid medium. The faster rate of decomposition of V-05"•02 relative to V03+-02H reflects the respective oxidizing strengths of V05~a nd V03+. Also, high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
3 Ionic conductivity, σ, at room temperature vs the molar fraction of “conducting bonds”, I/(I + O). Key: ▿ = AgI−Ag 2 O−MoO 3 (σ from refs , , and 58 (extrapolated from low temperature), ▾ = AgI−(Ag 2 O·2B 2 O 3 ) (σ from ref ), ○ = AgI−(Ag 2 O.B 2 O 3 ) (σ from ref ), ▵ = AgI−(Ag 2 O·4B 2 O 3 ) (σ from ref ), · = AgI−Ag 2 O−P 2 O 5 (σ from refs , , ), ▪ = AgI−Ag 2 WO 4 (σ from ref ), and ◇ = α-AgI (σ from ref (extrapolated from high temperature)). The dashed line is the nonlinear best-fit with eq 2 (three parameters, Levenberg−Marquardt algorithm, R 2 = 0.99).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
3 Ionic conductivity, σ, at room temperature vs the molar fraction of “conducting bonds”, I/(I + O). Key: ▿ = AgI−Ag 2 O−MoO 3 (σ from refs , , and 58 (extrapolated from low temperature), ▾ = AgI−(Ag 2 O·2B 2 O 3 ) (σ from ref ), ○ = AgI−(Ag 2 O.B 2 O 3 ) (σ from ref ), ▵ = AgI−(Ag 2 O·4B 2 O 3 ) (σ from ref ), · = AgI−Ag 2 O−P 2 O 5 (σ from refs , , ), ▪ = AgI−Ag 2 WO 4 (σ from ref ), and ◇ = α-AgI (σ from ref (extrapolated from high temperature)). The dashed line is the nonlinear best-fit with eq 2 (three parameters, Levenberg−Marquardt algorithm, R 2 = 0.99).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 with literature data for T g , 26,29,30,43,68 s dc , 26,[29][30][31]43,69 and E a . 26,[29][30][31]43,68,69 Starting with T g (Fig. 3a) we note that values reported in ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The evolution of properties observed here as a function of AgI content is compared in Fig. 3 with literature data for T g , 26,29,30,43,68 s dc , 26,[29][30][31]43,69 and E a . 26,[29][30][31]43,68,69 Starting with T g (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One model proposes the formation of a structurally inhomogeneous glass where MX ͑mainly AgI͒ forms microdomains or clusters within the host matrix. [31][32][33][34][35] Movement of silver ions is thought to be facilitated by the formation of conducting pathways along the AgI microdomains. 2 A second model suggests that AgI is highly dispersed in interstices or voids controlled by oxygen atoms of the host matrix and that AgI enhances ionic conductivity by lowering the potential energy barriers within the glass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%