1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.37.9331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelectric effect as a test of exotic superconductivity

Abstract: I show that measurements of thermoelectric effects can provide a simple criterion for distinguishing between ordinary superconductivity and superconductivity characterized by an order parameter with symmetry less than that of the underlying Fermi surface. An externally imposed temperature gradient gives rise generally to circulating currents and magnetic 6elds which vanish only if the thermoelectric and electromagnetic responses of the superconductor are isotropic. An estimate of the magnitude of this effect s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In non conventional superconductors with nodes of the gap, the pair breaking effect of even non magnetic impurities or defects leads to a finite density of states at the Fermi level, due to virtual bound states forming a band of width γ (see Refs. [9][10][11][13][14][15][16][17][18][31][32][33][34]). This band is easier to observe when the impurities are in the unitarity scattering limit (scattering phase shift δ = π/2), and in heavy fermion superconductors, impurity scattering is expected to be in this limit [9].…”
Section: Superconducting Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In non conventional superconductors with nodes of the gap, the pair breaking effect of even non magnetic impurities or defects leads to a finite density of states at the Fermi level, due to virtual bound states forming a band of width γ (see Refs. [9][10][11][13][14][15][16][17][18][31][32][33][34]). This band is easier to observe when the impurities are in the unitarity scattering limit (scattering phase shift δ = π/2), and in heavy fermion superconductors, impurity scattering is expected to be in this limit [9].…”
Section: Superconducting Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3,[5][6][7][8] for experimental and Refs. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] for theoretical work) has already demonstrated that the thermal conductivity (κ) in this compound is of electronic origin at very low temperature, and thus sensitive to the electronic excitations in the superconducting state. Compared to the specific heat C, κ is a directional probe, and it seems [5,6] that the anomaly present in the specific heat below 100mK does not influence κ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents the contribution to the heat current from a small region of space around R, in which the local superfluid velocity is v s (R), from quasiparticles at the Fermi level. Impurity vertex corrections, which vanish identically at H = 0, [17] are still negligible, of order Hγ 2 /(H c2 ∆ 2 0 ). Here γ ≡ Σ ′′ 0 (0) is the broadening of the nodal quasiparticle states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ситуация существенно изменилась после открытия ВТСП, у которых и Т с выше и меньше. Так, при Т с ~ 100 К и ~ 0,1 эВ уже [8] Учитывая грубость оценки (18), вполне может оказаться, что для ка ких то материалов даже Далее, если спаривание является не s спариванием, как в теории БКШ, а р или d спариванием (и, вообще, как говорят, экзотическим спариванием), то возрастает в раз [19,20] и, таким образом, даже при оценке типа (18), ~ 1. Ана логична с ВТСП ситуация для сверхпроводников с тяжелыми фермионами [231.…”
unclassified
“…Но каковы подлинные значения b n в монокристаллах ВТСП при Т < Т с , мы не знаем. Они могут быть не столь уже малыми даже при S спаривании, а при экзотическом спари вании будут значительны [19,20]. Тем интереснее, очевидно, осуществить соответствующие измерения.…”
unclassified