2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4904996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelectric and mechanical properties of spark plasma sintered Cu3SbSe3 and Cu3SbSe4: Promising thermoelectric materials

Abstract: We report the synthesis of thermoelectric compounds, Cu3SbSe3 and Cu3SbSe4, employing the conventional fusion method followed by spark plasma sintering. Their thermoelectric properties indicated that despite its higher thermal conductivity, Cu3SbSe4 exhibited a much larger value of thermoelectric figure-of-merit as compared to Cu3SbSe3, which is primarily due to its higher electrical conductivity. The thermoelectric compatibility factor of Cu3SbSe4 was found to be ∼1.2 as compared to 0.2 V−1 for Cu3SbSe3 at 55… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
38
3
Order By: Relevance
“…8 reported for other state-of-the-art TE materials [29,30,32,34,35,52], but are lower than those reported by the authors for n-type Si 80 Ge 20 nanostructured alloys [29,30].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 reported for other state-of-the-art TE materials [29,30,32,34,35,52], but are lower than those reported by the authors for n-type Si 80 Ge 20 nanostructured alloys [29,30].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…This nanostructured alloy exhibited a hardness of ~ 9 ± 0. alloy compared with other state-of-the-art thermoelectric materials, such as Bi 2 Te 3 , [33] Bi 2 Te 3 +0.1Vol.%SiC [33],LAST [78], Bi 0.5 Sb 1.5 Te 3 +0.2Vol.%B 4 C [79], PbTe+PbS [80], Cu 3 SbSe 3 and Cu 3 SbSe 4 [34], Cu 2 Se [52], Co 4 Sb 12 [35], In 0.1 Co 4 Sb 12 [35], n-type nanostructured Si 80 Ge 20 alloys [29,30]. [36], PbTe [36] and ntype nanostructured Si 80 Ge 20 alloy [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This value is comparable with our previously reported 5 microwave assisted Cu 3 SbSe 4 (0.14 at 300 K) [31] and also with CuSb 0.98 Ti 0.02 Se 2 (0.0041 at 300 K) [18]. But lower than reported in Cu 3 Sb 0.98 Bi 0.02 Se 4 (0.7 at 600 K) [12], in Cu 3 Sb 0.975 Sn 0.025 Se 4 (0.75 at 673 K) [20], in Cu 3 Sb 0.94 Sn 0.06 Se 3.5 S 0.5 (1.1 at 700 K) [24], in Cu 3 Sb 0.98 Sn 0.02 Se 4 (1.05 at 700 K) [25], in Cu 3 SbSe 4 10 (0.30 at 550 K) [28], in Cu 2.925 SbSe 4 (0.50 at 673 K) [29], in Cu 2.95 Sb 0.98 Sn 0.02 Se 4 (~0.7 at 673 K) [30] and in Cu 3 Sb 0.97 Al 0.03 Se 4 (0.58 at 600 K) [44]. This reported value might be improved at higher temperatures or may be with controlled addition of different dopant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cu 3 SbSe 3 and CuSbSe 2 both have ultralow thermal conductivity that was thought to be governed by a large lattice anharmonicity [12] caused by lone-pair electron of Sb [13]. Compared with widely studied Cu 3 SbSe 4 , researches of Cu 3 SbSe 3 are inadequate because it is difficult to obtain the single phase [14] and they have poor TE properties [15]. After being sealed in quartz ampoules and followed by a long-time annealing, there are still other phases [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%