1988
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9614(88)90148-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of (gallium + chlorine)(g) I. Vapour-pressure measurements and thermodynamic stability of GaCl(g), GaCl2(g), GaCl3(g), Ga2Cl2(g), Ga2Cl4(g), and Ga2Cl6(g)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, no clear temperature dependency was observed in the temperature range (550 C-650 C) investigated, and no activation energy for the etching could be deduced. However, comparing the formation enthalpies of GaCl, GaCl 3 , 30 and GaAs, 31 one nds that GaCl 3 is the energetically most favorable product, assuming the same initial conditions for the reactants (liquid Ga, gaseous Cl and As). Detailed thermodynamic calculations on the suggested reactions are beyond the scope of this study, and are therefore only discussed qualitatively.…”
Section: Post-growth Etchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, no clear temperature dependency was observed in the temperature range (550 C-650 C) investigated, and no activation energy for the etching could be deduced. However, comparing the formation enthalpies of GaCl, GaCl 3 , 30 and GaAs, 31 one nds that GaCl 3 is the energetically most favorable product, assuming the same initial conditions for the reactants (liquid Ga, gaseous Cl and As). Detailed thermodynamic calculations on the suggested reactions are beyond the scope of this study, and are therefore only discussed qualitatively.…”
Section: Post-growth Etchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is higher than those found in literature obtained by second-law treatment of the vapor pressures: Komshilova et al, (72.8 ± 2.1) kJ·mol −1 , Dumas and Potier and Laubengayer and Schirmer, both equal to 73.5 kJ·mol −1 (as recalculated by us using the heat content functions in ref ), Opperman et al, (68.5 ± 3.0) kJ·mol −1 , and Chusova et al (80.3 and 67.2) kJ·mol −1 from second- and third-law treatments of their vapor pressures, respectively. In particular it is interesting to note that the third-law sublimation enthalpy value calculated by Chusova et al (67.2 kJ·mol −1 ) using heat capacities and entropies of Ga 2 Cl 6 (g) and of GaCl 3 (s) found in literature is different than those recalculated by us using the IVTANTHERMO’s fef, (101.0 and 89.6) kJ·mol −1 at the extreme experimental temperatures of the work and (310 and 350) K, respectively. Besides, these values show a decidedly evident temperature trend considering the small range.…”
Section: Experimental and Results Sectionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The Cl-Cl bonds are associated with molecular chlorine formed in the supercritical fluid resulting from the monomer disproportionation: GaCl 3 ⇌ GaCl + Cl 2 . Gallium monochloride is typically observed at high temperatures, becoming predominant above 1100 K [ 17 , 18 ]. In our case, GaCl remains elusive, either forming intermediate species via homopolar Ga-Ga and heteropolar Ga-Cl bonding or persisting as diatomic molecules (with a residual 50% occurrence in the latter two cases).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%